Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

149,00 € / $224.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
May 2011
ISSN:
1613-1134
DOI:
10.1515/kant.2011.002

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 149.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 224.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 197.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 296.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 237.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 356.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

European Science Foundation ranking A

Kant-Studien

Philosophische Zeitschrift der Kant-Gesellschaft

Ed. by Baum, Manfred / Dörflinger, Bernd / Klemme, Heiner F.

4 Issues per year

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Kant and Whewell on Bridging Principles between Metaphysics and Science

1*Postdoctoral Research Fellow of the Research Foundation (FWO–Vlaanderen) and is associated with the Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science at Ghent University (Blandijnberg 2, B–9000 Ghent, Belgium).

Citation Information: Kant-Studien. Volume 102, Issue 1, Pages 22–45, ISSN (Online) 1613-1134, ISSN (Print) 0022-8877, DOI: 10.1515/kant.2011.002, May 2011

Publication History:
Published Online:
2011-05-31

Abstract

In this essay, I call attention to Kant's and Whewell's attempt to provide bridging principles between a priori principles and scientific laws. Part of Kant's aim in the Opus postumum (ca. 1796–1803) was precisely to bridge the gap between the metaphysical foundations of natural science and physics by establishing intermediary concepts or ‘Mittelbegriffe’ (henceforth this problem is referred to as ‘the bridging-problem’). It will be argued, on the basis of a close reading of Whewell's Notebooks on Induction, that Whewell's account of the Idea of Cause (and by extension, his doctrine of Fundamental Ideas in general) grew out of his dissatisfaction with Kantian philosophy of science and its seeming inability to solve the bridging-problem. This analysis throws new light on the importance of Kantianism in Whewell's philosophy, for it will be shown that Whewell took over and transformed Kant's idea of a priori principles as conditions for the establishment of proper knowledge about the world (without always clinging to Kant's exact differentiation between them) and that Whewell was trying to address a typical Kantian topic: namely, to show how scientific knowledge could be both empirical and necessary and how the gap between metaphysics and physics could be bridged.

Keywords.: W. Whewell's Kantianism; W. Whewell's Trinity Notebooks on induction; post-critical Kant; Bridging principles between metaphysics and science

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.