Volume 5 (2014)
Volume 4 (2013)
Volume 3 (2012)
Volume 2 (2011)
Most Downloaded Articles
- Novelty and social preference in phonetic accommodation by Babel, Molly/ McGuire, Grant/ Walters, Sophia and Nicholls, Alice
- Gestural reduction, lexical frequency, and sound change: A study of post-vocalic /l/ by Lin, Susan/ Beddor, Patrice Speeter and Coetzee, Andries W.
- Speech rhythm and temporal structure: Converging perspectives? by Goswami, Usha and Leong, Victoria
- Cognitive processing as a bridge between phonetic and social models of sound change by Harrington, Jonathan and Stevens, Mary
- Sound change in the individual: Effects of exposure on cross-dialect speech processing by Clopper, Cynthia G.
Neuromagnetic reflections of harmony and constraint violations in Turkish
1*Department of Linguistics, University of Maryland
+Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive & Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
Citation Information: Laboratory Phonology. Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 99–123, ISSN (Online) 1868-6354, ISSN (Print) 1868-6346, DOI: 10.1515/labphon.2011.003, May 2011
- Published Online:
Vowel harmony is a phonotactic principle that requires adjacent vowels to agree in certain vowel features. Phonological theory considers this principle to be represented in one's native grammar, but its abstractness and perceptual consequences remain a matter of debate. In this paper, we are interested in the brain's response to violations of harmony in Turkish. For this purpose, we test two acoustically close and two acoustically distant vowel pairs in Turkish, involving different kinds of harmony violations. Our measure is the Mismatch Negativity (MMN), an automatic change detection response of the brain that has previously been applied for the study of native phoneme representations in a variety of languages. The results of our experiment support the view that vowel harmony is a phonological principle with a language-specific long-term memory representation. Asymmetries in MMN responses support a phonological analysis of the pattern of results, but do not provide evidence for a pure acoustic or a pure probabilistic approach. Phonological analyses are given within Optimality Theory (OT) and within an underspecification account.