Volume 5 (2013)
Volume 4 (2012)
Most Downloaded Articles
- The role of working memory in the comprehension of unfamiliar and familiar metaphors by Mashal, Nira
- Point of view in British Sign Language and spoken English narrative discourse: the example of “The Tortoise and the Hare” by Earis, Helen and Cormier, Kearsy
- Complex imitation and the language-ready brain by Arbib, Michael A.
- Toward a theory of semantic representation by Vigliocco, Gabriella/ Meteyard, Lotte/ Andrews, Mark and Kousta, Stavroula
Prototype constructions in early language acquisition
1University of Manchester
2MPI for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig
Citation Information: Language and Cognition. Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 59–85, ISSN (Online) 1866-9859, ISSN (Print) 1866-9808, DOI: 10.1515/LANGCOG.2009.004, May 2009
- Published Online:
In this paper we bring together several lines of cross-linguistic research to demonstrate the role of prototypicality in young children's acquisition of the transitive construction. Much research has shown that young children are slow to form abstract constructions because they fail to see the more general applicability of syntactic markers such as word order and case marking. Here we attempt to explain this fact by investigating the nature of the language children do and do not hear, specifically, the reliability and availability of the linguistic cues they are exposed to. We suggest that constructions redundantly marked with multiple cues could have a special status as a nucleus around which the prototype forms—which makes it difficult for them to isolate the functional significance of each cue. The implications of this view for language acquisition are discussed within a usage-based framework.