The programme of Subject Reviews commissioned by the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), and organised by the Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) in 2000-2001, is reviewed in this paper. The Subject Review process, which sought to assess the quality of higher education in England and Northern Ireland in individual subject disciplines, is explained, and evaluated critically from the viewpoint of a subject reviewer. The process enabled a limited sharing of best practice, and compelled institutions to review their approach to the provision of a suitable learning environment for their students. The pros and cons of the approach as a mechanism for ensuring quality are discussed, based on the experiences of the author. Finally, the extent to which such reviews are of long-term benefit is considered.
Ed. by John, Nancy R. / Johnson, Ian M. / Larsen, Svend
4 Issues per year
iMPACT FACTOR 2011: 0.259
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.373
Issues
Volume 63 (2013)
Volume 62 (2012)
Volume 61 (2011)
Volume 60 (2010)
Volume 59 (2009)
Volume 58 (2008)
Volume 57 (2007)
Volume 56 (2006)
Volume 55 (2005)
Volume 54 (2004)
Volume 53 (2003)
Volume 52 (2002)
Volume 51 (2001)
Volume 50 (2000)
Volume 49 (1999)
Volume 48 (1998)
Volume 47 (1997)
Volume 46 (1996)
Volume 45 (1995)
Volume 44 (1994)
Volume 43 (1993)
Volume 42 (1992)
Volume 41 (1991)
Volume 40 (1990)
Volume 39 (1989)
Volume 38 (1988)
Volume 37 (1987)
Volume 36 (1986)
Volume 35 (1985)
Volume 34 (1984)
Volume 33 (1983)
Volume 32 (1982)
Volume 31 (1981)
Volume 30 (1980)
Volume 29 (1979)
Volume 28 (1978)
Volume 27 (1977)
Volume 26 (1976)
Volume 25 (1975)
Volume 24 (1974)
Volume 23 (1973)
Volume 22 (1972)
Volume 21 (1971)
Volume 20 (1970)
Volume 19 (1969)
Volume 18 (1968)
Volume 17 (1967)
Volume 16 (1966)
Volume 15 (1965)
Volume 13 (1964)
Volume 14 (1964)
Volume 12 (1962)
Volume 11 (1961)
Volume 10 (1960)
Volume 9 (1959)
Volume 8 (1958)
Volume 7 (1958)
Volume 6 (1956)
Volume 5 (1955)
Volume 4 (1954)
Volume 3 (1954)
Volume 2 (1953)
Volume 1 (1950)
Most Downloaded Articles
- Towards Library 2.0: The Adoption of Web 2.0 Technologies in Public Libraries by Anttiroiko, Ari-Veikko and Savolainen, Reijo
- The Library-Community Convergence Framework for Community Action: Libraries as Catalysts of Social Change by Mehra, Bharat and Srinivasan, Ramesh
- Working with Facebook in Public Libraries: A Backstage Glimpse into the Library 2.0 Rhetoric by Carlsson, Hanna
- Google Scholar: The New Generation of Citation Indexes by Noruzi, Alireza
- Sense-Making and Synchronicity: Information-Seeking Behaviors of Millennials and Baby Boomers by Connaway, Lynn Silipigni/ Radford, Marie L./ Dickey, Timothy J./ De Angelis Williams, Jocelyn and Confer, Patrick
The Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) and Subject Review: The Viewpoint of the Assessor
Judith Broady-Preston
1Department of Information Studies, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, UK
Citation Information: Libri. Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages 195–198, ISSN (Print) 0024-2667, DOI: 10.1515/LIBR.2002.195, December 2007
Publication History:
- Received:
- 2002-09-19
- Accepted:
- 2002-10-22
- Published Online:
- 2007-12-10
Comments (0)