Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
January 2010
ISSN:
1865-8423
DOI:
10.1515/libr.2009.019

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 313.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 470.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 313.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 470.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Ed. by John, Nancy R. / Johnson, Ian M. / Larsen, Svend

4 Issues per year

iMPACT FACTOR 2011: 0.259
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.373

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

A Critical Review of User Acceptance Research in the Area of Mobile Services

Elisabeth Platzer1

1Research student in the doctoral programme at the Institute for Information Science and Information Systems, Karl Franzens University, Graz, Austria. Email: elisabeth.platzer@uni-graz.at

Citation Information: Libri. Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages 213–227, ISSN (Online) 1865-8423, ISSN (Print) 0024-2667, DOI: 10.1515/libr.2009.019, January 2010

Publication History:
Received:
2009-05-10
Accepted:
2009-08-10
Published Online:
2010-01-29

Scientific rigor and practical relevance are extensively discussed and highly important criteria of the quality of scientific articles. This research examines the balance of these criteria within the domain of technology acceptance research for mobile services. 2073 articles were considered for the study and 24 that covered the topic were chosen for detailed review. Five sub-criteria for rigor (theoretical base, research model, sample choice, questionnaire and tests) and four sub-criteria for relevance (success factors, target group, timeliness and limitations) were elaborated to evaluate the articles. Most articles meet rigor criteria quite well, whereas the number of articles with sufficient relevance is significantly lower. The often-assumed contradiction of rigor and relevance could not be supported. The study thus concludes that both criteria are non-exclusive and can coexist in one article

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.