Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation


An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: van der Auwera, Johan

6 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2013: 0.658
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.626
Rank 72 out of 169 in category Linguistics in the 2013 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.584
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 1.068

ERIH category 2011: INT1



Scope and the structure of bare nominals: evidence from child language

Ana T Pérez-Leroux1 / 2

*Correspondence address: A. T. Pérez-Leroux, Department of Spanish and Portuguese, University of Toronto, Victoria College, 73 Queen's Park Crescent, Toronto ON M5S 1K7, Canada.

Citation Information: Linguistics. Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages 927–960, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: 10.1515/ling.37.5.927, February 2008

Publication History

Published Online:


The special semantic characteristics of bare nominals (nonspecificity and lack of scopal interactions) are best explained in terms of an approach that views these not as full DPs, but as minimal nominal projections containing an internal pro argument. The evidence from child language suggests that such aspects of the interpretation of bare nominals are readily accessible in children's grammar. Thirty-six English-speaking children participated in a controlled comprehension study comparing their interpretation of sentences with quantifiers involving both the bare noun construction and full DPs. Children seemed to readily understand the interpretive differences between the two structures, suggesting that the presence or absence of a determiner is a sufficient trigger for the acquisition of such construction.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.