Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
February 2008
ISSN:
1613-396X
DOI:
10.1515/ling.37.6.1111

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 584.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 876.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 701.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 1052.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: Auwera, Johan

6 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 0.494
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.593
ERIH category 2011: INT1

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

The evolution of c-structure: prepositions and PPs from Indo-European to Romance

cor1*Correspondence address:

Citation Information: Linguistics. Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages 1111–1153, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: 10.1515/ling.37.6.1111, February 2008

Publication History:
Received:
1998-06-30
Revised:
1999-10-12
Published Online:
2008-02-20

Abstract

Within X-bar theory prepositions are standardly taken to constitute one of the core lexical categories along with verbs, nouns, and adjectives definable by the features [±V, ±N]. Synchronically, however they share properties with both lexical and functional categories, while diachronically they are usually the outcome of processes of grammaticalization affecting true lexical categories such as verbs, nouns, and adjectives. The present paper analyzes in detail the stages whereby prepositions in Latin and Romance evolve from earlier adverbial particles and concludes that this diachronic trajectory is best modeled within a framework that separates the relational structure of a PP from its configurational representation. It is argued that lexical-functional grammar, with its systematic distinction between f-structure and c-structure, provides a better account of these changes than conventional X-bar theory. In conclusion a possible role for optimality theory within a formal account of syntactic change is briefly sketched.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.