Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: van der Auwera, Johan

6 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2013: 0.658
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.626
Rank 72 out of 169 in category Linguistics in the 2013 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition
ERIH category 2011: INT1

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

The evolution of c-structure: prepositions and PPs from Indo-European to Romance

*Correspondence address: Department of Linguistics, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

Citation Information: Linguistics. Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages 1111–1153, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: 10.1515/ling.37.6.1111, February 2008

Publication History

Received:
1998-06-30
Revised:
1999-10-12
Published Online:
2008-02-20

Abstract

Within X-bar theory prepositions are standardly taken to constitute one of the core lexical categories along with verbs, nouns, and adjectives definable by the features [±V, ±N]. Synchronically, however they share properties with both lexical and functional categories, while diachronically they are usually the outcome of processes of grammaticalization affecting true lexical categories such as verbs, nouns, and adjectives. The present paper analyzes in detail the stages whereby prepositions in Latin and Romance evolve from earlier adverbial particles and concludes that this diachronic trajectory is best modeled within a framework that separates the relational structure of a PP from its configurational representation. It is argued that lexical-functional grammar, with its systematic distinction between f-structure and c-structure, provides a better account of these changes than conventional X-bar theory. In conclusion a possible role for optimality theory within a formal account of syntactic change is briefly sketched.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.