Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
May 2006
ISSN:
1613-396X
DOI:
10.1515/LING.2006.014

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 584.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 876.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 701.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 1052.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: Auwera, Johan

6 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 0.494
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.593
ERIH category 2011: INT1

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Extra argumentality — affectees, landmarks, and voice

cor1

Citation Information: Linguistics. Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 383–424, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: 10.1515/LING.2006.014, May 2006

Publication History:
Received:
2004-01-20
Revised:
2005-03-31
Published Online:
2006-05-10

Abstract

This article investigates sentences with additional core arguments of a special type in three languages, viz. German, English, and Mandarin. These additional arguments, called extra arguments in the article, form a crosslinguistically homogeneous class by virtue of their structural and semantic similarities, with so-called “raised possessors” forming just a sub-group among them. Structurally, extra arguments may not be the most deeply embedded arguments in a sentence. Semantically, their referents are felt to stand in a specific relation to the referent of the/a more deeply embedded argument. There are two major thematic relations that are instantiated by extra arguments, viz. affectees and landmarks. These thematic role notions are justified in the context of, and partly in contrast to, Dowty’s (1991) proto-role approach. An affectee combines proto-agent with proto-patient properties in eventualities that are construed as involving causation. A landmark is a ground with respect to some spatial configuration denoted by the predication at hand, but a figure at the highest level of gestalt partitioning that is relevant in a clause. Thereby, both affectees and landmarks are inherently hybrid categories. The account of extra argumentality is couched in a neo-Davidsonian event semantics in the spirit of Kratzer (1996, 2003), and voice heads are assumed to introduce affectee arguments and landmark arguments right above VP.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.