Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
March 2008
ISSN:
1613-396X
DOI:
10.1515/LING.2008.005

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 584.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 876.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 701.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 1052.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: Auwera, Johan

6 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 0.494
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.593
ERIH category 2011: INT1

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

“Vivid narrative use” and the meaning of the present perfect in spoken Australian English

1 / Dulcie M Engel2

cor1*Correspondence address: Marie-Eve Ritz,

Citation Information: Linguistics. Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 131–160, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: 10.1515/LING.2008.005, March 2008

Publication History:
Received:
2003-05-20
Revised:
2005-05-09
Published Online:
2008-03-11

Abstract

This article examines the use of the present perfect (PP) in Australian English using a corpus of stories told during radio chat-show programs and news reports. We find that the PP is used (i) as a narrative tense in spoken texts both with and without narrative present (NarPres); (ii) in sequences of clauses expressing temporal progression; and (iii) with some definite temporal adverbials denoting past time. Such uses are either unusual or unacceptable in other English varieties. A systematic comparison of contexts where NarPres and narrative PP are used in oral narratives reveals that the PP replaces the NarPres predominantly with verbs denoting events. Usage in news reports, where the narrative interpretation is not possible, suggests that a temporal ambiguity exists in the current interpretation of PP sentences. Analysis of lexical aspect shows that the majority of verbs used in the narrative PP are both durative and contain a process part, a fact that helps explain the sense of vividness achieved. At the discourse level, use of the PP enables the speaker to present situations as tightly connected. Such extensions in usage show a possible path for change for a category that is known to be historically unstable in its meaning

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.