Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
March 2008
ISSN:
1613-396X
DOI:
10.1515/LING.2008.011

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 584.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 876.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 701.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 1052.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: Auwera, Johan

6 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 0.494
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.593
ERIH category 2011: INT1

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

The word in sign language: empirical evidence and theoretical controversies

cor1*Correspondence address:

Citation Information: Linguistics. Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages 249–308, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: 10.1515/LING.2008.011, March 2008

Publication History:
Received:
2004-12-02
Revised:
2007-11-03
Published Online:
2008-03-12

Abstract

This article is concerned with the “word” in sign language, the “grammatical” and especially the “prosodic word”. Both notions of the “word” are central in sign language linguistics and psycholinguistic. Converging evidence for the size and complexity of the prosodic word is reviewed, stemming from morphological processes such as compounding, derivation, and classification as well as from phonological processes such as coalescence, epenthesis, and deletion. Additional evidence from slips of the hand and their repairs is presented showing that (i) in slips, grammatical as well as prosodic words are involved and that (ii) slip-repair sequences may keep within the limit of the prosodic word. The distinctive morphological typology and the canonical word shape pattern in sign language is explained by modality differences which act on the Phonetic Form (PF) interface. Sign languages are processed more on the vertical axis — simultaneously — whereas spoken languages are processed more on the horizontal axis — sequentially. As a corollary, the information packaging in both language modalities is different while processing is basically the same. Controversial theoretic topics around the notion of the “word” in sign language such as iconicity and notoriously recalcitrant constructions such as classifier predicates are discussed.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.