The dual theory of reduplication : Linguistics Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: van der Auwera, Johan


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 0.763
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.872
Rank 78 out of 179 in category Linguistics in the 2015 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.496
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 1.099
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.689

99,00 € / $149.00 / £75.00*

Online
ISSN
1613-396X
See all formats and pricing
Select Volume and Issue
Loading journal volume and issue information...

The dual theory of reduplication

*Correspondence address: Department of Linguistics, University of California at Berkeley, 1203 Dwinelle, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

Citation Information: Linguistics. Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages 351–401, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: 10.1515/LING.2008.013, March 2008

Publication History

Received:
2004-12-02
Revised:
2007-12-09
Published Online:
2008-03-12

Abstract

This article argues that the fundamental typological distinction pertaining to reduplication is that between phonological duplication and morphological doubling (the Dual Theory of reduplication). Phonological duplication, which occurs for a phonological purpose such as providing an onset or nucleus for a syllable or filling in the featural content of an otherwise unspecified timing unit in the representation, is formally related to phonological assimilation, modeled here via the mechanism of string-internal correspondence. It obeys phonological locality conditions, targets phonologically defined constituents, and is sensitive to phonological markedness considerations. Morphological doubling, which occurs for a morphological purpose such as marking a change in meaning or creating a new stem type, is the result of the doubling of a morphological category such as root, stem, or affix. Morphological doubling, modeled via the “double insertion” mechanism of Morphological Doubling Theory (Inkelas and Zoll 2005), is not derived by phonological correspondence and therefore is not subject to any of the phonological properties characteristic of phonological duplication; the two copies, related morphosemantically, are phonologically independent.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Laura J. Downing and Sharon Inkelas
Language and Linguistics Compass, 2015, Volume 9, Number 12, Page 516
[2]
Alexander Clark and Ryo Yoshinaka
Machine Learning, 2014, Volume 96, Number 1-2, Page 5
[3]
Iris Berent, Colin Wilson, Gary F. Marcus, and Douglas K. Bemis
Linguistic Inquiry, 2012, Volume 43, Number 1, Page 97

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.