Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
July 2012
ISSN:
1613-396X
DOI:
10.1515/ling-2012-0027

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 584.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 876.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 701.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 1052.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: Auwera, Johan

6 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 0.494
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.593
ERIH category 2011: INT1

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Positive polarity items, negation, activated propositions

1University of Caen

cor1Département des Sciences du Langage, Université de Caen Basse-Normandie, Esplanade de la Paix, BP5186, 14032 Caen Cedex 5, France

Citation Information: . Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages 869–900, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: 10.1515/ling-2012-0027, July 2012

Publication History:
Received:
2009-06-23
Revised:
Published Online:
2012-07-17

Abstract

The received view on the distribution of polarity items is that positive polarity items (PPIs) such as something are found in positive contexts; they are anti-licensed by negative contexts, which license negative polarity items (NPIs) such as anything. PPI some can however be found under the scope of clause-mate negation. Such a paradoxical use has been analyzed by Szabolcsi (2004) as a special case of licensing: two negative polarity licensors are required by the internal constitution of some. Some is however shown to occur under the scope of a single clause-mate negative. Single and dual negative environments are argued to depend on the same determinism. This determinism is shown to be activated propositions in the sense of Dryer (1996). Propositions accessible to the hearer characterize the contexts where some and other PPIs come under the scope of clause-mate negation in English and other languages, as demonstrated by the transferable diagnostics proposed. The reason for this correlation is that activation brings the whole proposition into the focus of negation, which does not interact directly with the PPI to produce infelicitous interpretations. A simple and general pragmatic determinism accounts for the marked character of the sequences, that allows a clear distinction to be maintained between licensed NPIs and anti-licensed PPIs.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.