Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Linguistic Typology

Ed. by Plank, Frans

3 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2014: 0.273

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.313
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2014: 0.593
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2014: 0.415

ERIH category 2011: INT1

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Still mirative after all these years

1University of Oregon, U.S.A.

Citation Information: Linguistic Typology. Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 529–564, ISSN (Online) 1613-415X, ISSN (Print) 1430-0532, DOI: 10.1515/lity-2012-0020, December 2012

Publication History

Published Online:
2012-12-30

Abstract

This article re-presents the case, first presented in DeLancey (1997), for the mirative as a crosslinguistic category, and responds to critiques of that work by Gilbert Lazard and Nathan Hill. The nature of the mirative, a category which marks a statement as representing information which is new or unexpected, is exemplified with data from Kham (Tibeto-Burman) and Hare (Athabaskan). The mirative category is shown to be distinct from the well-known mediative or indirective evidential category. Finally, the role of mirativity in the complex verbal systems of Tibetan languages is briefly outlined.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.