Performative Utterances: Seven Puzzles
It was John Austin who introduced the word "performative" (which he called "a new and ugly word") into the philosophy of language and linguistics. His original idea was that there are utterances which are more correctly characterized as doing something rather than stating something. Austin wrote: "when I say ‘I do’ (sc. take this woman to be my lawful wedded wife), I am not reporting on a marriage, I am indulging in it." As is well known, Austin went on to work out this notion of a performative utterance (and of a performative expression) in a number of directions, but in the end the attempt to isolate performatives (doings) from constatives (true or false) failed dramatically, and the idea of viewing language use in terms of the performative-constative dichotomy gave way to the study of speech acts: "The total speech act in the total speech situation is the only actual phenomena which, in the last resort, we are engaged in elucidating." But giving up the performative-constative distinction does not mean giving up theorizing about performatives, and there is a cottage industry in the theory of language devoted to them. We identify seven puzzles for theorizing about performatives. We consider how Austin might have dealt with some of them. Finding his answers problematic, we then survey recent theories of performatives and zoom in on the major contenders, identifying one theory in particular for scrutiny and seeing how it fares with the seven puzzles. The upshot is that there is still work to be done understanding performatives.
References
Austin, John. "Performative utterances." In Philosophical Papers by John Austin. Oxford: OUP, 1961.Search in Google Scholar
Austin, John. Philosophical Papers. Oxford: OUP, 1961.Search in Google Scholar
Austin, John. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: OUP, 1962.Search in Google Scholar
Bach, Kent. "Standardization vs conventionalization." Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (1995): 677-686.10.1007/BF00983302Search in Google Scholar
Bach, Kent., and Robert M. Harnish. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1979.Search in Google Scholar
Bach, Kent., and Robert M. Harnish. "How performatives really work: a reply to Searle." Linguistics and Philosophy 15 (1992): 93-110.10.1007/BF00635834Search in Google Scholar
Barwise, Jon and John Perry. Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT, 1983.Search in Google Scholar
Cole, Peter and Jerry Morgan, eds. Syntax and Semantics 3. New York: Academic Press, 1975.Search in Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry and Zenon Pylyshyn. "Connectionism and cognitive architecture." In Connections and Symbols, edited by Steven Pinker and Jacques Mehler, 78-102. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press, 1988.Search in Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. "Hedged performatives." In Syntax and Semantics 3, edited by Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan, 44-68. New York: Academic Press, 1975.Search in Google Scholar
Gale, Richard. "Do performative utterances have any constative function?" Journal of Philosophy 5 (1970): 117-121.10.2307/2023942Search in Google Scholar
Ginet, Carl. "Performativity." Linguistics and Philosophy 3 (1979): 245-265.10.1007/BF00126512Search in Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Gunter and Georg Meggle, eds. Speech Acts, Mind and Society. Boston: Kluver, 2002.10.1007/978-94-010-0589-0Search in Google Scholar
Harnish, Robert M. "Two consequences of transparent subject position." Philosophical Studies 30 (1976): 11-18.10.1007/BF00355280Search in Google Scholar
Harnish, Robert M. "A projection problem for pragmatics." In Syntax and Semantics 9, edited by Frank Heny and Helmut Schnelle, 16-33. New York, Academic Press, 1979.Search in Google Scholar
Harnish, Robert M. "Performatives are default reflexive standardized indirect speech acts." Acta Linguistica Hungarica 38 (1988): 83-106.Search in Google Scholar
Harnish, Robert M. Review of Francois Recanati (1987), Meaning and Force, Cambridge: CUP. The Philosophical Review April 1991: 297-300.Search in Google Scholar
Harnish, Robert M. "Meaning and performatives." In Translation and Meaning, edited by Marcel Thelen and Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, 90-111. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Rijkshogeschool, 1991.Search in Google Scholar
Harnish, Robert M. "Communicating with proverbs." Communication and Cognition 26 (1993): 16-33.Search in Google Scholar
Harnish, Robert M., ed. Basic Topics in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1994.Search in Google Scholar
Harnish, Robert M. "Performatives and standardization: a progress report." Linguistische Berichte 8 (1997): 161-175.10.1007/978-3-663-11116-0_10Search in Google Scholar
Harnish, Robert M. "Are performative utterances declarations?" In Speech Acts, Mind and Society, edited by Gunter Grewendorf and Georg Meggle, 55-76. Boston: Kluver, 2002.10.1007/978-94-010-0589-0_4Search in Google Scholar
Harnish, Robert M. "Performatives as constatives vs declarations: some recent issues." In Seduction, Community, Speech: Festschrift for Herman Parret, edited by Frank Brisard, Michael Meeuwis and Bart Vandenabeele, 26-41. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2004.Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, David. Convention. Cambridge, MA: HUP, 1969.Search in Google Scholar
Moore, George E. "Reply to my critics." In The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, edited by Paul Schilpp, 112-136. Chicago: Northwestern University Press, 1942.Search in Google Scholar
Moore, George E. "Russell's theory of descriptions." In The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, edited by Paul Schilpp, 80-99. Chicago: Northwestern University Press, 1944.Search in Google Scholar
Recanati, Francois. Meaning and Force: The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances. Cambridge: CUP, 1987.Search in Google Scholar
Reimer, Marga. "Performative utterances: a reply to Bach and Harnish." Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (1995): 655-675.10.1007/BF00983301Search in Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold and Arnold Zwicky. "Speech act distinctions in syntax." In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, edited by Timothy Shopen, 155-196. Cambridge: CUP, 1985.Search in Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. "Pragmatic self verification and performatives." Foundations of Language 7 (1971): 300-302.Search in Google Scholar
Schiffer, Stephen. Meaning. Oxford: OUP, 1972.Search in Google Scholar
Searle, John. Speech Acts. Cambridge: CUP, 1969.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Search in Google Scholar
Searle, John. Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: CUP, 1979.10.1017/CBO9780511609213Search in Google Scholar
Searle, John. Intentionality. Cambridge: CUP, 1983.10.1017/CBO9781139173452Search in Google Scholar
Searle, John. "How do performatives work?" Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (1989): 535-558.10.1007/BF00627773Search in Google Scholar
Searle, John., and Daniel Vanderveken. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: CUP, 1985.10.1007/1-4020-3167-X_5Search in Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: HUP, 1986.Search in Google Scholar
Stampe, Dennis. "Meaning and truth in the theory of speech acts." In Syntax and Semantics 3, edited by Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan, 170-198. New York: Academic Press, 1975.Search in Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter. "Intention and convention in speech acts." Philosophical Review October 1964: 439-460.10.2307/2183301Search in Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold and Jerrold Sadock. "Ambiguity tests and how to fail them." In Syntax and Semantics 4, edited by John Kimball, 21-44. New York: Academic Press, 1975.Search in Google Scholar
This content is open access.