Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

49,00 € / $74.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
November 2010
ISSN:
1864-1547
DOI:
10.1515/mamm.2010.058

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 49.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 74.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 240.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 360.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 288.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 432.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Editor-in-Chief: Denys, Christiane

Editorial Board Member: Aulagnier, Stephane / Catzeflis, Francois M. / Ganem, Guila / Granjon, Laurent / Krasnov, Boris / Krystufek, Boris / Veron, Geraldine / Amori, Giovanni / Capanna, Ernesto / Emmons, Louise H. / Goodman, Steve M. / Gurnell, John / Henttonen, Heikki / Leirs, Herwig / Lunde, Darrin / Mitchell-Jones, Anthony J. / Moutou, Francois / Shenbrot, Georgy I. / Taylor, Peter J. / Vieira, Marcus Vinicius

4 Issues per year

Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 0.808
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.885

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Use of GPS activity sensors to measure active and inactive behaviours of European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)

Elisa Gottardi1 / Frédérique Tua1 / Bruno Cargnelutti1 / Marie-Line Maublanc1 / Jean-Marc Angibault1 / Sonia Said2 / Hélène Verheyden1

1INRA, UR035, Comportement et Ecologie de la Faune Sauvage, BP 52627, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan Cedex, France

2Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, CNERA-CS, Montfort, 01330 Birieux, France

Corresponding author

Citation Information: mammalia. Volume 74, Issue 4, Pages 355–362, ISSN (Online) 1864-1547, ISSN (Print) 0025-1461, DOI: 10.1515/mamm.2010.058, November 2010

Publication History:
Published Online:
2010-11-03

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of GPS 3300 to predict active (feeding, moving) and inactive (bedded, standing) behaviours in European roe deer. Observed activity of three tame roe deer was correlated with the three variables provided by the activity sensors of their collars (normalised for each individual) using discriminant analyses. The best model discriminated correctly 84% of the “active” time intervals (defined as roe deer spending at least 30% of the time active) and 97% of inactive ones. We tested for consistency with movements using 11 wild roe deer, six living in a forest and five in an open habitat. As expected, wild deer identified as inactive (sensors) were mostly immobile (GPS locations, 831 records of 1096), whereas deer known to be moving were mostly classified as active (493 of 758 records). The records classified as inactive but moving (24% of inactive records or 35% of moving records) can indicate short distance displacement, erroneous detection of movement, or moving without neck movements. The records classified as active but immobile (46% of active ones, 33% of immobile ones) can represent feeding on a small patch without detectable movements.

Keywords: activity; feeding; moving; resting; sensor; telemetry

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.