Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access September 18, 2013

Validation of videodensitometric myocardial perfusion assessment

  • Ferenc Nagy EMAIL logo , Attila Nemes , Tamás Szűcsborus , Tamás Ungi , András Katona , Viktor Sasi , Zsolt Zimmermann , Anita Kalapos , Tamás Forster and Imre Ungi
From the journal Open Medicine

Abstract

[1] Camici P.G., Crea F.N., Coronary microvascular dysfunction, N. Engl. J. Med., 2007, 356, 830–840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra06188910.1056/NEJMra061889Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Knaapen P., Camici P.G., Marques K.M., Nijveldt R., Bax J.J., Westerhof N., et al., Coronary microvascular resistance: methods for its quantification in humans, Basic Res. Cardiol., 2009, 104, 485–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00395-009-0037-z10.1007/s00395-009-0037-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[3] Kern M.J., Coronary physiology revisited: practical insights from the cardiac catheterization laboratory, Circulation, 2000, 101, 1344–1351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.101.11.134410.1161/01.CIR.101.11.1344Search in Google Scholar

[4] Fearon W.F., Balsam L.B., Farouque H.M., Caffarelli A.D., Robbins R.C., Fitzgerald P.J,, Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation, Circulation, 2003, 107, 3129–3132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000080700.98607.D110.1161/01.CIR.0000080700.98607.D1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Aarnoudse W., Fearon W.F., Manoharan G., Geven M., van de Vosse F., Rutten M., et al., Epicardial stenosis severity does not affect minimal microcirculatory resistance, Circulation, 2004, 110, 2137–2142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000143893.18451.0E10.1161/01.CIR.0000143893.18451.0ESearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Ng M.K., Yeung A.C., Fearon W.F., Invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation: superior reproducibility and less hemodynamic dependence of index of microcirculatory resistance compared with coronary flow reserve, Circulation, 2006, 113, 2054–2061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.60352210.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.603522Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] van’t Hof A.W., Liem A., Suryapranata H., Hoorntje J.C., de Boer M.J., Zijlstra F., Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade. Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group, Circulation, 1998, 97, 2302–2306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.97.23.230210.1161/01.CIR.97.23.2302Search in Google Scholar

[8] Gibson C.M., Cannon C.P., Murphy S.A., Ryan K.A., Mesley R., Marble S.J. et al., Relationship of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade to mortality after administration of thrombolytic drugs, Circulation, 2000, 101, 125–130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.101.2.12510.1161/01.CIR.101.2.125Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Korosoglou G., Haars A., Michael G., Erbacher M., Hardt S., Giannitsis E. et al., Quantitative evaluation of myocardial blush to assess tissue level reperfusion in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: incremental prognostic value compared with visual assessment, Am. Heart. J., 2007, 153, 612–620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2006.12.01910.1016/j.ahj.2006.12.019Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Haeck J.D., Gu Y.L., Vogelzang M., Bilodeau L., Krucoff M.W., Tijssen J.G. et al,. Feasibility and applicability of computer-assisted myocardial blush quantification after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv., 2010, 75, 701–706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.2232910.1002/ccd.22329Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Vogelzang M., Vlaar P.J., Svilaas T., Amo D., Nijsten M.W., Zijlstra F., Computer-assisted myocardial blush quantification after percutaneous coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: a substudy from the TAPAS trial, Eur. Heart. J., 2009, 30, 594–599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn54210.1093/eurheartj/ehn542Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Ungi T., Ungi I., Jónás Z., Sasi V., Lassó A., Zimmermann Z. et al., Myocardium selective densitometric perfusion assessment after acute myocardial infarction, Cardiovasc. Revasc. Med., 2009, 10, 49–54 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2008.10.00110.1016/j.carrev.2008.10.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Ungi T., Zimmermann Z., Balázs E., Lassó A., Ungi I., Forster T. et al,. Vessel masking improves densitometric myocardial perfusion assessment, Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging, 2009, 25, 229–236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-008-9374-510.1007/s10554-008-9374-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Pijls N.H., De Bruyne B., Smith L., Aarnoudse W., Barbato E., Bartunek J. et al., Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: validation in humans, Circulation, 2002, 105, 2482–2486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000017199.09457.3D10.1161/01.CIR.0000017199.09457.3DSearch in Google Scholar

[15] Chelliah R., Senior R., An update on contrast echocardiography, Minerva Cardioangiol., 2009, 57, 483–493 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Nagel E., Lima J.A., George R.T., Kramer CM., Newer methods for noninvasive assessment of myocardial perfusion: cardiac magnetic resonance or cardiac computed tomography?, JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging, 2009, 2, 656–660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.02.00710.1016/j.jcmg.2009.02.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Hachamovitch R., Berman D.S., Kiat H., Cohen I., Cabico J.A., Friedman J. et al., Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease: incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification, Circulation, 1996, 93, 905–914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.93.5.90510.1161/01.CIR.93.5.905Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Al-Mallah M.H., Sitek A., Moore S.C., Di Carli M., Dorbala S., Assessment of myocardial perfusion and function with PET and PET/CT, J. Nucl. Cardiol., 2010, 17, 498–513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-010-9223-510.1007/s12350-010-9223-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[19] Blankstein R., Di Carli M.F., Integration of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion imaging, Nat. Rev. Cardiol., 2010, 7, 226–236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2010.1510.1038/nrcardio.2010.15Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Miller J.M., Rochitte C.E., Dewey M., Arbab-Zadeh A., Niinuma H., Gottlieb I. et al., Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT, N. Engl. J. Med., 2008, 359, 2324–2336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa080657610.1056/NEJMoa0806576Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Wijns W., De Bruyne B., Vanhoenacker P.K., What does the clinical cardiologist need from noninvasive cardiac imaging: is it time to adjust practices to meet evolving demands?, Nucl. Cardiol., 2007, 14, 366–370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.04.01610.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.04.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Leung D.Y., Leung M., Non-invasive/invasive imaging: significance and assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction, Heart, 2011, 97, 587–595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2009.18332710.1136/hrt.2009.183327Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Korosoglu G., Riedle N., Erbacher M., Dengler T.J., Zugck C., Rottbauer W. et al., Quantitative myocardial blush grade for the detection of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Am Heart J, 2010, 159, 643–651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2009.12.02310.1016/j.ahj.2009.12.023Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Havers J., Haude M., Erbel R., Spiller P., X-ray densitometric measurement of myocardial perfusion reserve in symptomatic patients without angiographically detectable coronary stenoses, Herz, 2008, 33, 223–232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00059-008-3022-710.1007/s00059-008-3022-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Pijls N.H., Van Gelder B., Van der Voort P., Peels K., Bracke F.A., Bonnier H.J. et al., Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow, Circulation, 1995, 92, 3183–3193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.92.11.318310.1161/01.CIR.92.11.3183Search in Google Scholar

[26] Abaci A., Oguzhan A., Eryol N.K., Ergin A., Effect of potential confounding factors on the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial frame count and its reproducibility, Circulation,1999, 100, 2219–2223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.100.22.221910.1161/01.CIR.100.22.2219Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Published Online: 2013-9-18
Published in Print: 2013-10-1

© 2013 Versita Warsaw

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 28.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/s11536-013-0168-3/html
Scroll to top button