Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

The Journal of Nordic Centre for Welfare and Social Issues


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 0.768

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.321
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.485
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.618

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1458-6126
See all formats and pricing

 


Select Volume and Issue
Loading journal volume and issue information...

Implementing guidelines for substance abuse treatment: a critical discussion of "Knowledge to Practice"

Patrik Karlsson1 / Anders Bergmark1

Dept. of social work, Stockholm University1

This content is open access.

Citation Information: Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 253–265, ISSN (Online) 1458-6126, ISSN (Print) 1455-0725, DOI: 10.2478/v10199-012-0017-8, June 2012

Publication History

Published Online:
2012-06-19

Implementing guidelines for substance abuse treatment: a critical discussion of "Knowledge to Practice"

AIMS - We critically discuss the campaign "Knowledge to Practice". A popular assumption within the evidence-based practice (EBP) framework is that guidelines for best practices are useful for increasing the inflow of research into practice. In Sweden, an initiative known as "Knowledge to Practice" (KTP) has since 2008 been devoted to implementing the National Board of Health and Welfare's guidelines for substance abuse treatment in practice. MATERIAL - Our critical discussion is based on an analysis of available documents describing the KTP campaign. RESULTS - We argue that the implementation process is marred with problems all the way from the beginning, where the guidelines are produced, to the final stage of local "adoption". The vague character of the guidelines coupled with unclear usages of key concepts such as "service user involvement" and EBP as well as a perspective of EBP that in certain respects undermine the legitimacy of its own mission lead us to raise serious doubt about KTP. CONCLUSSIONS - We conclude that KTP can be seen as a clear example of a general unawareness of the two main, largely incompatible "models" of EBP identified in the literature. Further, KTP may as a consequence of this have had the unintended effect of disseminating vague and unclear conceptions of EBP to practitioners.

Keywords: Evidence-based practice; guidelines for best practice; substance abuse treatment critique; Knowledge to Practice; Sweden

  • Babor, T. & Del Boca, F. (2003): Treatment matching in alcoholism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

  • Berglund, M. & Thelander, S. & Jonsson, E. (2003): Treating alcohol and drug abuse: An evidence based review. Viernheim, wiley-VCH

  • Bergmark, A. (2007): Riktlinjer och den evidensbaserade praktiken - en kritisk granskning av de nationella riktlinjerna för missbrukarvård i Sverige (Guidelines and evidence-based practice - a critical appraisal of the Swedish national guidelines for addiction treatment). Nordisk Alkohol- och Narkotikatidskrift 24 (5): 519-529

  • Bergmark, A. & Bergmark, Å. & Lundström, T. (2011): Evidensbaserat socialt arbete. Teori, kritik, praktik (Evidence-based social work. Theory, critique, practice). Stockholm: Natur & Kultur

  • Bergmark, A. & Lundström, T. (2006): Mot en evidensbaserad praktik? Om färdriktningen i socialt arbete (Towards an evidence-based practice? On the direction of social work). Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift 13: 99-113

  • Bergmark, A. & Lundström, T. (2011): Guided or independent? Social workers, central bureaucracy and evidence-based practice. European Journal of Social Work 14 (3): 323-337

  • Bergmark, Å. & Lundström, T. (2002): Education, practice and research: Knowledge and attitudes to knowledge. Social Work Education 21: 359-373 [CrossRef]

  • Brunsson, N. (2006): Mechanisms of hope. Maintaining the dream of the rational organization. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press

  • Daly, J. (2005): Evidence-based medicine and the search for a science of clinical care. Berkeley: University of California Press/New York: Milbank Memorial Fund

  • Finney, J. (2000): Limitations in using existing alcohol treatment trials to develop practice guidelines. Addiction 95 (10): 1491-1500

  • Ford, S. & Schofield, T. & Hope, T. (2003): What are the ingredients for a successful evidence-based patient choice consultation? A qualitative study. Social Science & Medicine 56: 589-602 [CrossRef]

  • Forbes, J. & Sashidharan, S. P. (1997): User involvement in services - incorporation or challenge? British Journal of Social Work 27: 481-498 [CrossRef]

  • Gambrill, E. (2006): Evidence-based practice and policy: choices ahead. Research on Social Work Practice 16 (3): 338-357 [CrossRef]

  • Gandhi, A. G. & Murphy-Graham, E. & Petrosino, A. & Schwarz-Chrismer, S. & Weiss, C. (2007): The devil is in the details. Examining the evidence for "proven" school-based drug abuse prevention programs. Evaluation Review 31 (1): 43-74 [CrossRef] [PubMed]

  • Gorman, D. M., & Huber, J. C. (2009). The social construction of "evidence-based" drug prevention programs: a reanalysis of data from the Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) Program. Evaluation Review 33 (4): 396-414 [PubMed] [Web of Science] [CrossRef]

  • Guyatt, G. & Meade, M. & Jaeschke, R. & Cook, D. & Haynes, R. (2000): Practitioners of evidence based care. Not all clinicians need to appraise evidence from scratch but all need some skills. British Medical Journal 320: 954-955

  • Haynes, R. B. & Sacket, D. L. & Gray, J. M. A. & Cook, D. J. & Guyatt, G. H. (1996): Transferring evidence from research into practice: The role of clinical care research evidence in clinical decisions. Evidence-Based Medicine 7 (1): 196-198

  • Howard, M. H. & Jenson, J. M. (1999): Clinical practice guidelines should social work develop them? Research on Social Work Practice 9: 283-301 [CrossRef]

  • IMS-nytt (IMS-news) (2006): Nr 3. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.

  • King, A. (2011): Service user involvement in methadone maintenance programmes: the "philosophy, the ideal and the reality". Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 18: 276-284 [Web of Science]

  • Luborsky, L. & Rosenthal, R. & Diguer, L. & Andrusyna, T. & Berman, J. & Levitt, J. & Seligman, D. & Krause, E. (2002): The Dodo Bird Verdict Is Alive and Well - Mostly. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 9 (1): 2-12

  • Poulton, B. C. (1999): User involvement in identifying health needs and shaping and evaluating services: is it being realised? Journal of Advanced Nursing 30 (6): 1289-1296 [PubMed] [CrossRef]

  • Raistrick, D. & Heather, N. & Godfrey, C. (2006): Review of the effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems. London: National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse

  • Rosen, A. & Proctor, E. K. & Staudt, M. (2003): Targets of change and interventions in social work: an empirically based prototype for developing practice guidelines. Research on Social Work Practice 13 (2): 208-233 [CrossRef]

  • Sackett, D. & Strauss, S. & Richardson, W. & Rosenberg, W. & Haynes, R. (2000): Evidence-based medicine: How to practiceand teach EBM. London: Churchill and Livingstone

  • Satterfield, J. M. & Spring, B. & Brownson, R. C. & Mullen, E. J. & Newhouse, R. P. & Walker, B. B. & Whitlock, E. P. (2009): Towards a transdisciplinary model of evidence-based practice. The Milbank Quarterly 87 (2): 368-390 [CrossRef] [Web of Science]

  • SBU (2001): Behandling av alkohol- och narkotikaproblem. En evidensbaserad kunskapssammanställning (volym I och II) (Treatment of alcohol- and drug problems. An evidence-based knowledge compilation.). SBU- Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering, Stockholm

  • Socialstyrelsen (2007): Nationella riktlinjer för missbrukar- och beroendevård (National Guidelines for substance abuse- and addiction treatment). Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen

  • Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting (2009): Nationell baskurs. Ett arbetsmaterial för att komma vidare (National Basic Course. A working material for progress). Stockholm: Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting

  • Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting (2010): Lägesbeskrivning och motiv för en ny fas i Kunskap till Praktik. Uppbyggnad av ett kvalificerat stöd för personal som arbetar med riskbruk, missbruk, beroende och samsjuklighet (Situation desription and motive for a new face within Knowledge to Practice. The construction of a qualified support for staff who work with risky use, substance abuse, addiction and comobitidy). Stockholm: Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting

  • Timmermans, S. & Berg, M. (2003): The gold standard. The challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Philadelphia: Temple University Press

  • UKATT Research Team (2005): Effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems: Findings of the randomised United Kingdom Alcohol Treatment Trial (UKATT). British Medical Journal 331: 541-544

  • Upshur, R. & Tracy, S. (2004): Legitimacy, authority, and hierarchy: Critical challenges for evidence-based medicine. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention 4: 197-204

  • West, S. L. & O'Neal, K. K. (2004): Project D. A. R. E. Outcome Effectiveness Revisited. American Journal of Public Health 94 (6): 1027-1029. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Patrik Karlsson and Anders Bergmark
Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 2012, Volume 29, Number 3

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.