Alcohol-related sickness absence of young employees in Norway: The impact of social roles and socioeconomic status : Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

www.degruyter.com uses cookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience.
To understand more about cookies, tags, and tracking, see our Privacy Statement
I accept all cookies for the De Gruyter Online site

Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

The Journal of Nordic Centre for Welfare and Social Issues


IMPACT FACTOR 2014: 0.564

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.176
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2014: 0.278
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2014: 0.257

Open Access
VolumeIssuePage

Alcohol-related sickness absence of young employees in Norway: The impact of social roles and socioeconomic status

1Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research (SIRUS)

2Department of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo

© Line Schou et al.. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Citation Information: Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 411–426, ISSN (Online) 1458-6126, DOI: 10.1515/nsad-2015-0040, September 2015

Publication History

Published Online:
2015-09-19

Abstract

AIMS – First, to establish whether there are differences in alcohol-related sickness absence according to socioeconomic status and family situation among young employees in Norway. Second, if differences are found, to assess whether they can be attributed mainly to differences in drinking patterns.

METHODS – A sample of young, employed adults was obtained from the fourth wave of the Young in Norway study (2005) and the data were merged with registry data from Statistics Norway (N =1611). The data were analysed using cross tables and logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS – Being male, single, not having children and having a low income were associated with alcohol-related sickness absence, but the association was not significant on education and social status. Introducing frequencies of drinking and drinking to intoxication in the regression model attenuated some associations with alcohol-related sickness absence.

CONCLUSION – Alcohol-related sickness absence is more common among people who are single and without children, and more common among men than women. With the exception of income, socioeconomic factors do not seem to be important. The differences between groups appear to be only partly a result of different drinking patterns.

Keywords: Sickness absence; absenteeism; alcohol; heavy drinking; family roles; socioeconomic status; young employees; Norway

REFERENCES

  • Birkelund, G., & Lemel, Y. (2013). Lifestyles and social stratification: An explorative study of France and Norway. Comparative Social Research, 30, 189–220. [CrossRef]

  • Bloomfield, K., Grittner, U., Kramer, S., & Gmel, G. (2006). Social inequalities in alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems in the study countries of the EU concerted action “Gender, culture and alcohol problems: A multi-national study”. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 41(Supplement, 1), 26–36. [CrossRef]

  • Chan, T., Birkelund, G., Aas, A., & Wiborg, O. (2010). Social status in Norway. European Sociological Review, 27, 451–468. [Web of Science] [CrossRef]

  • Chan, T., & Goldthorpe, J. (2005). The social stratification of theatre, dance and cinema attendance. Cultural Trends, 14, 193–212.

  • Edland-Gryt, M., Bryhni, A., Skretting, A., Lund, M., & Bye, E. K. (2012). Alcohol and drugs in Norway. Oslo: SIRUS, Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research.

  • Gjelsvik, R. (2004). Utredning av de samfunnsmessige kostnadene relatert til alkohol (Estimation of societal costs related to alcohol). Bergen: Stein Rokkan Center for Social Studies.

  • Gjerde, H., Christophersen, A. S., Moan, I. S., Yttredal, B., Walsh, J. M., Normann, P. T., et al. (2010). Use of alcohol and drugs by Norwegian employees: A pilot study using questionnaires and analysis of oral fluid. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 5, 13. [Web of Science] [CrossRef]

  • Gmel, G., Bloomfield, K., Ahlström, S., Choquet, M., & Lecomte, T. (2000). Women’s roles and women’s drinking: A comparative study in four European countries. Substance Abuse, 21(4), 249–264. [CrossRef]

  • Grimsmo, A., & Rossow, I. (1997). Alkohol og sykefravær. Oslo: SIRUS, Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research.

  • Grittner, U., Kuntsche, S., Gmel, G., & Bloomfield, K. (2012). Alcohol consumption and social inequality at the individual and country levels: Results from an international study. European Journal of Public Health, 23(2), 332–339. [Web of Science] [CrossRef]

  • Hajema, K. J., & Knibbe, R. A. (1998). Changes in social roles as predictors of changes in drinking behaviour. Addiction, 93(11), 1717–1727. [CrossRef]

  • Hammer, T. (1999). Sykefravær og rusmiddelbruk blant unge i arbeid [Sickness absence and the use of alcohol and drugs among young workers]. Oslo: NOVA, Norwegian Social Research.

  • Horverak, O., & Bye, E. K. (2007). Det norske drikkemønsteret. En studie basert på intervjudata fra 1973–2004 [The Norwegian drinking pattern: A study based on interview data from 1973–2004]. Oslo: SIRUS, Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research.

  • Huckle, T., You, R. Q., & Casswell, S. (2010). Socio-economic status predicts drinking patterns but not alcohol-related consequences independently. Addiction, 105(7), 1192–1202. [Web of Science] [CrossRef]

  • Johansson, E., Bockerman, P., & Uutela, A. (2009). Alcohol consumption and sickness absence: Evidence from microdata. European Journal of Public Health, 19(1), 19–22. [Web of Science] [CrossRef]

  • Kuendig, H., Plant, M. L., Plant, M. A., Kuntsche, S., Miller, P., Gmel, G., et al. (2008). Beyond drinking: Differential effects of demographic and socioeconomic factors on alcohol-related adverse consequences across European countries. European Addiction Research, 14(3), 150–160. [Web of Science] [CrossRef]

  • Mäkela, P., & Paljärvi T. (2008). Do consequences of a given pattern of drinking vary by socioeconomic status? A mortality and hospitalisation follow-up for alcohol-related causes of the Finnish Drinking Habits Surveys. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 62(8), 728–733. [CrossRef] [Web of Science]

  • McFarlin, S. K., & Fals-Stewart, W. (2002). Workplace absenteeism and alcohol use: A sequential analysis. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16(1), 17–21. [CrossRef]

  • Moore, S., Grunberg, L., & Greenberg, E. (2003). A longitudinal exploration of alcohol use and problems comparing managerial and nonmanagerial men and women. Addictive Behaviors, 28(4), 687–703. [CrossRef]

  • Paljärvi, T., Suominen, S., Car, J., & Koskenvuo, M. (2013). Socioeconomic disadvantage and indicators of risky alcohol-drinking patterns. Alcohol and Alcoholism 48(2), 207–214. [CrossRef] [Web of Science]

  • Roche, A. M., Pidd, K., Berry, J. G., & Harrison, J. E. (2008). Workers’ drinking patterns: The impact on absenteeism in the Australian work-place. Addiction, 103(5), 738–748. [CrossRef] [Web of Science]

  • Salonsalmi, A., Laaksonen, M., Lahelma, E., & Rahkonen, O. (2009). Drinking habits and sickness absence: The contribution of working conditions. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 37(8), 846–854. [Web of Science] [CrossRef]

  • Schou, L. A., Storvoll, E. E., & Moan, I. S. (2014). Alcohol-related sickness absence among young employees: Gender differences and the prevention paradox. The European Journal of Public Health, 24(3), 480–485. [CrossRef]

  • Selin, K. (2005). Predicting alcohol-related harm by sociodemographic background: High prevalence versus high risk. Contemporary Drug Problems, 32, 547–588.

  • Single, E., Robson, L., Xie, X., & Rehm, J. (1998). The economic costs of alcohol, tobacco and illicit drugs in Canada, 1992. Addiction, 93(7), 991–1006. [CrossRef]

  • Spak, F., Hensing, G., & Allebeck, P. (1998). Sick-leave in women with alcohol dependence or abuse: Effects of additional psychiatric disorders. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 33(12), 613–619. [CrossRef]

  • Storvoll, E. E., & Wichstrøm, L. (2003). Gender differences in changes in and stability of conduct problems from early adolecence to early adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 413–429. [CrossRef]

  • Strand, N. P., & von Soest, T. (2007). Young in Norway – longitudinal. Documentation of design, variables and scales Oslo: NOVA Norwegian Social Research.

  • Upmark, M., Möller, J., & Romelsjö, A. (1999). Longitudinal, population-based study of self reported alcohol habits, high levels of sickness absence, and disability pensions. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 53(4), 223–229. [CrossRef]

  • Wichstrøm, L., & Pedersen, W. (2001). Use of anabolic-androgenic steroids in adolescence: Winning, looking good or being bad? Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62, 5–13. [CrossRef]

  • Wilsnack, R. W., & Cheloa, R. (1987). Women’s roles and problem drinking across the lifespan. Social Problems, 34(3), 231–248. [CrossRef]

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.