Perner, J., Leekam, S. & Wimmer, H. (1987). Three-year-olds' difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 125-137. [CrossRef]
Perner, J., Ruffman, T., & Leekam, S. (1994). Theory of Mind is contagious: You catch it from your sibs. Child Development, 65, 1228-1238. [CrossRef]
Ruffman, T., Perner, J., Naito, M., Parkin, L., & Clements, W. (1998). Older (but not younger) siblings facilitate false belief understanding. Developmental Psychology, 34, 161-174. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Keenan, T. R., & Quigley, K. (1999). Do young children use echoic information in their comprehension of sarcastic speech? A test of echoic mention theory. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 83-96. [CrossRef]
Lewis, C., Freeman, N. H., Kyriakidon, C., Maridaki-Kassotaki, K., & Berridge, D. M. (1996). Social influences on false belief access: specific sibling influences or general apprenticeship? Child Development, 67, 2930-2947. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lillard, A. (2003). Discriminating pretend and real snacks: A fundamental problem in early cognition. British Psychological Society Developmental Section Conference, Coventry.
McRoberts, G. W. & Best, C. T. (1997). Accommodation in finding zero during mother-infant and father-infant vocal interactions: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Child Language, 24, 719-736. [CrossRef]
Mitchell, P. (1996). Acquiring a conception of mind: A review of psychological research and theory. Hove: Psychology Press.
Mitchell, P., Robinson, E. J., Nye, R. M., & Isaacs, J. E. (1997). When speech conflicts with seeing: Young children's understanding of informational priority. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64, 276-294. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Newton, P., Reddy, V. & Bull, R. (2000). Children's everyday deception and performance on false-belief tasks. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18, 297-317. [CrossRef]
Ninio, A. & Snow, C. (1996). Pragmatic development. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Perner, J. & Davies, G. (1991). Understanding the mind as an information processor: "Do young children have a copy theory of mind?" Cognition, 39, 51-69. [CrossRef]
Ackerman, B. (1982). Contextual integration and utterance interpretation: The ability of children and adults to interpret sarcastic utterances. Child Development, 53, 1075-1083. [CrossRef]
Astington, J. W. & Gopnik, A. (1991). Theoretical explanations of children's understanding of the mind. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 7-32. [CrossRef]
Baron-Cohen, S. & Ring, H. (1994). A model of the mindreading mechanism system: Neuropsychological and neurobiological perspectives. In C. Lewis & P. Mitchell (Eds.), Children's early understanding of mind: Origins and development (pp. 183-207). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Baron-Cohen, S. & Swettenham, J. (1996). The relationship between SAM and TOMM: Two hypotheses. In P. K. Smith & P. Carruthers (Eds.), Theories of theories of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, J. R. & Dunn, J. (1991). ‘You can cry, mum’: The social and developmental implications of talk about internal states. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 237-256. [CrossRef]
Capelli, C., Nakagawa, N., & Madden, C. (1990). How children understand sarcasm: The role of context and intonation. Child Development, 61, 1824-1841. [CrossRef]
Case, R. (1992). The mind's staircase. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Deleau, M. (1998). Entre l'acte et la pensée: de l'activité conjointe aux symbols et aux croyances. Enfance, 1, 37-47.
Deleau, M. (1999). Assessing links between conversational awareness and cognitive development. Developmental Science, 2, 16-18.
Deleau, M. & Bernard, S. (2003). Conversational awareness and ToM development. XIth European Conference on Developmental Psychology, Milan.
Deleau, M., Le Sourn, S., & Guehenneuc, K. (2000). Conversations and the representation of mind in preschool children. III Conference for Sociocultural Research, Sao Paulo.
Dunn, J. (1994). Changing minds and changing relationships. In C. Lewis & P. Mitchell (Eds.), Children's early understanding of mind: Origins and development (pp. 297-310). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dunn, J., Brown, J., Slomkowski, C., Tesla, C., & Youngblade, L. (1991). Young children's understanding of other people's feelings and beliefs: Individual differences and their antecedents. Child Development, 62, 1352-1366. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Pintilie, D. (1982). British picture vocabulary scale. London: NFER-Nelson.
Flavell, J. H. (1988). The development of children's knowledge about the mind: From cognitive connections to mental representations. In J. Washington, P. L. Harris, & D. R. Olson (Eds.), Developing theories of mind (pp. 244-267). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garfield, J. L., Peterson, C. C. & Perry, T. (2001). Social cognition, language acquisition and the development of the theory of mind. Mind & Language, 16, 494-541.
Gopnik, A. & Wellman, H. M. (1992). Why the child's theory of mind really is a theory. Mind & Language, 7, 145-171. [CrossRef]
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol 3, (pp 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
Hogrefe, G., Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1986). Ignorance versus false belief: A developmental lag in attribution of epistemic states. Child Development, 57, 567-582. [CrossRef]
Siegal, M. (1999a). Language and thought: the fundamental significance of conversational awareness for cognitive development. Developmental Science, 2, 1-34. [CrossRef]
Siegal, M. (1999b). Beyond methodology: Frequently asked questions on the significance of conversation for development. Developmental Science, 2, 29-34. [CrossRef]
Siegal, M. & Peterson, C. C. (1994). Children's theory of mind and the conversational territory of cognitive development. In C. Lewis & P. Mitchell (Eds.), Children's early understanding of mind: Origins and development (pp. 427-455). Hove: Erlbaum.
Siegal, M. & Want, S. C. (2003). Early sensory impairment and performance on theory of mind tasks. XIth European Conference on Developmental Psychology, Milan.
Sullivan, K., Winner, E., & Hopfield, N. (1995). How children tell a lie from a joke: The role of second-order mental state attributions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 191-204. [CrossRef]
Wimmer, H. & Hartl, M. (1991). Against the Cartesian view on the mind: Young children's difficulty with own false beliefs. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 125-138. [CrossRef]
Winner, E. (1988). The Point of Words: Children's Understanding of Metaphor and Irony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Winner, E. & Leekam, S. (1991). Distinguishing irony from deception: Understanding the speaker's second order intention. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 257-270. [CrossRef]
Yasui, M. & Lewis, C. (2003). The irony of false belief: Young children's understanding of sarcasm and mental states. British Psychological Society Developmental Section Conference, Coventry.
Volume 18 (2014)
Volume 17 (2013)
Volume 16 (2012)
Volume 15 (2011)
Most Downloaded Articles
- Specific Language Impairment (SLI): The Internet Ralli Campaign to Raise Awareness of SLI by Conti-Ramsden, Gina/ Bishop, Dorothy V. M./ Clark, Becky/ Norbury, Courtenay Frazier and Snowling, Margaret J.
- Book Review: Robert C. Gardner, Motivation and Second Language Acquisition: The Socio-Educational Model by Okuniewski, Jan E.
- Strategies of Translation by Płońska, Dagmara
- Individual Differences and Quality Of Translation: A Personality-Based Perspective by Karimnia, Amin and Mahjubi, Mahsa
- Irony as a Means of Perception Through Communication Channels. Emotions, Attitude and IQ Related to Irony Across Gender by Milanowicz, Anna
Young children's detection and decoding of ironic intonation
University of Strathclyde, Glasgow1
Institute of Education University of London2
This content is open access.
Citation Information: Psychology of Language and Communication. Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 29–54, ISSN (Print) 1234-2238, DOI: 10.2478/v10057-008-0002-1, August 2008
- Published Online:
Young children's detection and decoding of ironic intonation
Two studies examined 3- and 4-year-olds' ability to follow the mental ‘sub-text’ of conversations employing ironic intonation. In Study 1, children were asked what a confederate thought was inside a tin, following an exchange in which she saw (joke conditions) or did not see (lie conditions) the contents (a stone) and heard these referred to in neutral or ironic tone as a cake. Study 2 repeated the joke conditions, with the confederate touching the stone. Amongst 4-year-olds, intonation was found to trigger complex assessment of the information available to the confederate, whilst 3-year-olds appeared confused. The data suggest that ability to track the belief implications of conversations is underpinned by substantial improvements in working memory between 3 and 4 years.