Pertechnetate immobilization with amorphous iron sulfide : Radiochimica Acta International journal for chemical aspects of nuclear science and technology uses cookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience.
To understand more about cookies, tags, and tracking, see our Privacy Statement
I accept all cookies for the De Gruyter Online site

Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

In print for more than 50 years!

Radiochimica Acta

International Journal for chemical aspects of nuclear science and technology

Ed. by Qaim, Syed M.

IMPACT FACTOR 2014: 1.014
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.226
Rank 16 out of 34 in category Nuclear Science & Technology in the 2014 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.449
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2014: 0.782
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2014: 1.187



Pertechnetate immobilization with amorphous iron sulfide

Yongjian Liu1 / Jeff Terry2 / Silvia S. Jurisson*

1 University of Missouri-Columbia, Department of Chemistry, Columbia, U.S.A.

2 Illinois Institute of Technology, Department of Biological, Chemical, and Physical S, Chicago, U.S.A.

* Correspondence address: University of Missouri-Columbia, Department of Chemistry, 125 Chemistry Building, MO 65211 Columbia, U.S.A.,

Citation Information: Radiochimica Acta International journal for chemical aspects of nuclear science and technology. Volume 96, Issue 12, Pages 823–833, ISSN (Print) 0033-8230, DOI: 10.1524/ract.2008.1528, September 2009

Publication History

Published Online:


The reduction of pertechnetate (TcO4) with freshly prepared amorphous iron sulfide was investigated. The amorphous iron sulfide (FeS) was shown to have an elemental composition of FeS0.97 for all of the size fractions and a point of zero charge of pHpzc=7.4. Solubility studies of FeS in various buffers indicated that in the pH range 6.1–9.0, the concentrations of dissociated Fe2+ and S2− were negligible. The reductive immobilization of TcO4 with FeS was shown to be accelerated by increasing ionic strength and strongly pH dependent. At pH values below the pHpzc, the positively charged FeS surface reacted much faster with TcO4 and had higher immobilization yields relative to the negatively charged FeS surface at pH values above pHpzc. The TcO4−FeS reaction is consistent with a surface mediated reaction through ligand exchange. The TcO4−FeS reductive immobilization reaction product was characterized by X-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy (XANES), extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and found to be predominantly TcO2. Studies on the reductive capacity of the FeS and the long term stability of the TcO4−FeS reaction product under both anaerobic and aerobic environments shows the potential utility of the in situ gaseous (hydrogen sulfide gas) immobilization technology in solidification of TcO4 by creating a FeS permeable reaction barrier in the vadose zone.

Keywords: Technetium-99; Iron sulfide; Pertechnetate immobilization

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Yuanyuan Liu, Chongxuan Liu, Ravi K. Kukkadapu, James P. McKinley, John Zachara, Andrew E. Plymale, Micah D. Miller, Tamas Varga, and Charles T. Resch
Environmental Science & Technology, 2015
Laura Newsome, Katherine Morris, and Jonathan R. Lloyd
Chemical Geology, 2014, Volume 363, Page 164
Ji-Hoon Lee, John M. Zachara, James K. Fredrickson, Steve M. Heald, James P. McKinley, Andrew E. Plymale, Charles T. Resch, and Dean A. Moore
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2014, Volume 136, Page 247
R.T. Pabalan, G.W. Alexander, D.J. Waiting, C.S. Barr, V. L’Hostis, and R. Gens
EPJ Web of Conferences, 2013, Volume 56, Page 01010
Taishi Kobayashi, Andreas C. Scheinost, D. Fellhauer, Xavier Gaona, and Marcus Altmaier
Radiochimica Acta, 2013, Volume 101, Number 5, Page 323
Kirk J. Cantrell and Benjamin D. Williams
Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2013, Volume 437, Number 1-3, Page 424
N. Finck, K. Dardenne, D. Bosbach, and H. Geckeis
Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, Page 120904130253001
Ruiqiang Liu and Rattan Lal
Journal of Nanotechnology, 2012, Volume 2012, Page 1
T.S. Peretyazhko, J.M. Zachara, R.K. Kukkadapu, S.M. Heald, I.V. Kutnyakov, C.T. Resch, B.W. Arey, C.M. Wang, L. Kovarik, J.L. Phillips, and D.A. Moore
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2012, Volume 92, Page 48
Marek Kosmulski
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2009, Volume 337, Number 2, Page 439
S. M. Heald, K. M. Krupka, and C. F. Brown
Radiochimica Acta, 2012, Volume 100, Number 4, Page 243
Benjamin P. Burton-Pye, Ivana Radivojevic, Donna McGregor, Israel M. Mbomekalle, Wayne W. Lukens, and Lynn C. Francesconi
Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2011, Volume 133, Number 46, Page 18802
Marvourneen K. Dolor, Cynthia C. Gilmour, and George R. Helz
Geomicrobiology Journal, 2009, Volume 26, Number 7, Page 470
Yongjian Liu, Jeff Terry, and Silvia S. Jurisson
Radiochimica Acta, 2009, Volume 97, Number 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.