Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Since more than 50 years!

Radiochimica Acta

International Journal for chemical aspects of nuclear science and technology

Ed. by Qaim, Syed M.

12 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2014: 1.014
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.226
Rank 16 out of 34 in category Nuclear Science & Technology in the 2014 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.449
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2014: 0.782
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2014: 1.187

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Towards an optimized flow-sheet for a SANEX demonstration process using centrifugal contactors

D. Magnusson1 / Birgit Christiansen2 / J.-P. Glatz3 / Rikard Malmbeck* / G. Modolo4 / Daniel Serrano-Purroy5 / C. Sorel6

1 European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Transuranium Elements, Karlsruhe, Deutschland

2 European Commission, JRC, Institute for Transuranium Elements, Karlsruhe, Deutschland

3 European Commission JRC, Institute for Transuranium Elements, Karlsruhe, Deutschland

4 Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institute for Safety Research and Reactor Technolo, Jülich, Deutschland

5 European Commission JRC, Institute for Transuranium Elements, Karlsruhe, Deutschland

6 CEA Valrho, DRRV/SEMP, Bagnols-sur-Cèze, Frankreich

* Correspondence address: European Commission JRC, Institute for Transuranium Elements, Postfach 2340, 76125 Karlsruhe, Deutschland,

Citation Information: Radiochimica Acta International journal for chemical aspects of nuclear science and technology. Volume 97, Issue 3, Pages 155–159, ISSN (Print) 0033-8230, DOI: 10.1524/ract.2009.1587, September 2009

Publication History

Published Online:
2009-09-25

Abstract

The design of an efficient process flow-sheet requires accurate extraction data for the experimental set-up used. Often this data is provided as equilibrium data. Due to the small hold-up volume compared to the flow rate in centrifugal contactors the time for extraction is often too short to reach equilibrium D-ratios. In this work single stage kinetics experiments have been carried out to investigate the D-ratio dependence of the flow rate and to compare this with equilibrium batch experiments for a SANEX system based on CyMe4-BTBP. The first centrifuge experiment was run with spiked solutions while in the second a genuine actinide/lanthanide fraction from a TODGA process was used. Three different flow rates were tested with each set-up. The results show that even with low flow rates, only around 9% of the equilibrium D-ratio (Am) was reached for the extraction in the spiked test and around 16% in the hot test (the difference is due to the size of the centrifuges). In the hot test the lanthanide scrubbing was inefficient whereas in the stripping both the actinides and the lanthanides showed good results. Based on these results improvements of the suggested flow-sheet is discussed.

Keywords: Extraction; Kinetics; Partitioning; Centrifugal contactor; Minor actinides

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Taoxiang Sun, Wuhua Duan, Jinghui Wang, Jianchen Wang, and Jing Chen
Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange, 2015, Volume 33, Number 1, Page 75
[2]
Michael Carrott, Katie Bell, Jamie Brown, Andreas Geist, Colin Gregson, Xavier Hères, Chris Maher, Rikard Malmbeck, Chris Mason, Giuseppe Modolo, Udo Müllich, Mark Sarsfield, Andreas Wilden, and Robin Taylor
Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange, 2014, Volume 32, Number 5, Page 447
[3]
Daniel Magnusson, Andreas Geist, Rikard Malmbeck, and Udo Müllich
Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange, 2013, Volume 31, Number 6, Page 578
[4]
Christopher Klug and Ralf Sudowe
Separation Science and Technology, 2013, Volume 48, Number 17, Page 2567
[5]
Daniel Magnusson, Andreas Geist, and Rikard Malmbeck
Chemical Engineering Science, 2013, Volume 99, Page 292
[6]
Petra J. Panak and Andreas Geist
Chemical Reviews, 2013, Volume 113, Number 2, Page 1199
[7]
Giuseppe Modolo, A. Wilden, H. Daniels, Andreas Geist, Daniel Magnusson, and Rikard Malmbeck
Radiochimica Acta, 2013, Volume 101, Number 3, Page 155
[9]
Daniel Magnusson, Andreas Geist, Rikard Malmbeck, Giuseppe Modolo, and Andreas Wilden
Procedia Chemistry, 2012, Volume 7, Page 245
[10]
Giuseppe Modolo, A. Wilden, Andreas Geist, D. Magnusson, and Rikard Malmbeck
Radiochimica Acta, 2012, Volume 100, Number 8-9, Page 715
[11]
Anne E. V. Gorden, Michael A. DeVore, and Branson A. Maynard
Inorganic Chemistry, 2013, Volume 52, Number 7, Page 3445
[12]
Tatsuro MATSUMURA, Kazumi MATSUMURA, Yasuji MORITA, Yoshikazu KOMA, Yuichi SANO, and Kazunori NOMURA
Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 2011, Volume 48, Number 6, Page 855
[13]
D. Magnusson and R. Malmbeck
Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange, 2012, Volume 30, Number 2, Page 115
[14]
Andreas Wilden, Christian Schreinemachers, Michal Sypula, and Giuseppe Modolo
Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange, 2011, Volume 29, Number 2, Page 190
[15]
Tatsuro MATSUMURA, Kazumi MATSUMURA, Yasuji MORITA, Yoshikazu KOMA, Yuichi SANO, and Kazunori NOMURA
Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 2011, Volume 48, Number 6, Page 855

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.