Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

49,00 € / $74.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
October 2008
ISSN:
1555-5879
DOI:
10.2202/1555-5879.1126

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 49.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 74.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 176.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 237.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 212.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 285.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Editor-in-Chief: Parisi, Francesco

Ed. by Cooter, Robert D. / Gómez Pomar, Fernando / Kornhauser, Lewis A.

1 Issue per year

VolumeIssuePage

Transaction Costs, Neighborhood Effects, and the Diffusion of the Uniform Sales Act, 1906-47

Donald J. Smythe

1California Western School of Law

Citation Information: Review of Law & Economics. Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 341–372, ISSN (Online) 1555-5879, DOI: 10.2202/1555-5879.1126, October 2008

Publication History:
Published Online:
2008-10-24

The Uniform Sales Act was a precursor to Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code. Between 1906 and 1947 it was adopted in 34 states. Transaction cost theory suggests that states’ adoption decisions should have been influenced by “neighborhood effects” – the adoption decisions of their neighbors. This paper uses hazard analysis to test various hypotheses about the factors that influenced states’ adoption decisions. The results indicate that neighborhood effects were among the most important factors in the diffusion of the Act. Manufacturing interests also played an important role, especially in a small number of states that adopted the Act early. Subsequent to these early adoptions, the Act gradually diffused across most of the country, except the south. Its diffusion was driven primarily by neighborhood effects and manufacturing interests, although the legal profession and transportation systems may also have played a role. It appears that the Act ultimately failed to achieve complete uniformity largely because the neighborhood effects that drove its adoption in most of the country were not present in the south.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.