Review of Law & Economics
Editor-in-Chief: Parisi, Francesco
Ed. by Cooter, Robert D. / Gómez Pomar, Fernando / Kornhauser, Lewis A. / Parchomovsky, Gideon / Ulen, Thomas
3 Issues per year
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.179
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2014: 0.610
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2014: 0.311
Volume 11 (2015)
Volume 10 (2014)
Volume 9 (2013)
Volume 8 (2012)
Volume 7 (2011)
Volume 6 (2010)
Volume 5 (2009)
Volume 4 (2008)
Volume 3 (2007)
Volume 2 (2006)
Most Downloaded Articles
- Judicial Review in China: A Positive Political Economy Analysis by Ip, Eric C.
- The Establishment of Constitutional Courts: A Study of 128 Democratic Constitutions by Ramos, Francisco
- The Costs and Benefits of Secured Creditor Control in Bankruptcy: Evidence from the UK by Armour, John/ Hsu, Audrey Wen-hsin and Walters, Adrian
- On the Behavioral Economics of Crime by van Winden, Frans A.A.M. and Ash, Elliott
- Measuring Global Money Laundering: "The Walker Gravity Model" by Walker, John and Unger, Brigitte
Securities Class Actions: A Helping Hand for Bank Regulators in Trouble?
1Università Bocconi and Milano-Bicocca
2Università Bocconi and Milano-Bicocca
Citation Information: Review of Law & Economics. Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 214–242, ISSN (Online) 1555-5879, DOI: 10.2202/1555-5879.1459, July 2011
- Published Online:
By comparing the behavior of those US banks which faced Securities Class Actions (SCAs) in the 2000-2008 period with a control group of non-sued banks, we investigate the regulatory effects of this collective litigation procedure. The paper improves upon previous research by accounting for the endogenous nature of SCAs with respect to bank performance. This issue is addressed using an instrumental variable related to court severity. Two-Stage Least Squares estimates provide evidence that SCAs can stimulate more cautious attitudes towards risk, prompting the accumulation of reserves and recapitalization. We also find they are likely to enhance bank efficiency. However, our results also suggest that SCAs significantly increase dividend payouts while inducing a contraction of bank assets. SCAs are also likely to represent a warning signal of insolvency, as it emerges from the higher probability of being sued in case of high incidence of non-performing loans. We add an extension to the main analysis considering the probability of bank failures as a function of SCA occurrence. Results indicate that the latter is not likely to accelerate the former.
Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.