Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology

Editor-in-Chief: Stumpf, Michael P.H.

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2013: 1.055
Rank 48 out of 119 in category Statistics & Probability in the 2013 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.875
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 0.540

VolumeIssuePage

Correlation Between Gene Expression Levels and Limitations of the Empirical Bayes Methodology for Finding Differentially Expressed Genes

Xing Qiu1 / Lev Klebanov2 / Andrei Yakovlev3

1Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester

2Department of Probability and Statistics, Charles University, Institute of Informatics and Control of the National Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic

3Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester

Citation Information: Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology. Volume 4, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1544-6115, DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1157, November 2005

Publication History

Published Online:
2005-11-22

Stochastic dependence between gene expression levels in microarray data is of critical importance for the methods of statistical inference that resort to pooling test statistics across genes. The empirical Bayes methodology in the nonparametric and parametric formulations, as well as closely related methods employing a two-component mixture model, represent typical examples. It is frequently assumed that dependence between gene expressions (or associated test statistics) is sufficiently weak to justify the application of such methods for selecting differentially expressed genes. By applying resampling techniques to simulated and real biological data sets, we have studied a potential impact of the correlation between gene expression levels on the statistical inference based on the empirical Bayes methodology. We report evidence from these analyses that this impact may be quite strong, leading to a high variance of the number of differentially expressed genes. This study also pinpoints specific components of the empirical Bayes method where the reported effect manifests itself.

Keywords: microarray analysis; gene expression; two-sample tests; empirical Bayes method; correlated data; resampling techniques

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.