Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology
Editor-in-Chief: Stumpf, Michael P.H.
6 Issues per year
Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2012: 1.717
Rank 18 out of 117 in category Statistics & Probability in the 2012 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition
Mathematical Citation Quotient 2012: 0.07
Volume 12 (2013)
Volume 11 (2012)
Volume 10 (2011)
Volume 9 (2010)
Volume 8 (2009)
Volume 6 (2007)
Volume 5 (2006)
Volume 4 (2005)
Volume 3 (2004)
Volume 2 (2003)
Volume 1 (2002)
Most Downloaded Articles
- A General Framework for Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis by Zhang, Bin and Horvath, Steve
- Linear Models and Empirical Bayes Methods for Assessing Differential Expression in Microarray Experiments by Smyth, Gordon K
- Detecting Differential Expression in RNA-sequence Data Using Quasi-likelihood with Shrunken Dispersion Estimates by Lund, Steven P./ Nettleton, Dan/ McCarthy, Davis J. and Smyth, Gordon K.
- A Shrinkage Approach to Large-Scale Covariance Matrix Estimation and Implications for Functional Genomics by Schäfer, Juliane and Strimmer, Korbinian
- Normalization, bias correction, and peak calling for ChIP-seq by Diaz, Aaron/ Park, Kiyoub/ Lim, Daniel A. and Song, Jun S.
Testing for Trends in Dose-Response Microarray Experiments: A Comparison of Several Testing Procedures, Multiplicity and Resampling-Based Inference
3Tel Aviv University
5Johnson & Johnson PRD
6Johnson & Johnson PRD
7Johnson & Johnson PRD
8Johnson & Johnson PRD
9Johnson & Johnson PRD
Citation Information: Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology. Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1544-6115, DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1283, October 2007
- Published Online:
Dose-response studies are commonly used in experiments in pharmaceutical research in order to investigate the dependence of the response on dose, i.e., a trend of the response level toxicity with respect to dose. In this paper we focus on dose-response experiments within a microarray setting in which several microarrays are available for a sequence of increasing dose levels. A gene is called differentially expressed if there is a monotonic trend (with respect to dose) in the gene expression. We review several testing procedures which can be used in order to test equality among the gene expression means against ordered alternatives with respect to dose, namely Williams' (Williams 1971 and 1972), Marcus' (Marcus 1976), global likelihood ratio test (Bartholomew 1961, Barlow et al. 1972, and Robertson et al. 1988), and M (Hu et al. 2005) statistics. Additionally we introduce a modification to the standard error of the M statistic. We compare the performance of these five test statistics. Moreover, we discuss the issue of one-sided versus two-sided testing procedures. False Discovery Rate (Benjamni and Hochberg 1995, Ge et al. 2003), and resampling-based Familywise Error Rate (Westfall and Young 1993) are used to handle the multiple testing issue. The methods above are applied to a data set with 4 doses (3 arrays per dose) and 16,998 genes. Results on the number of significant genes from each statistic are discussed. A simulation study is conducted to investigate the power of each statistic. A R library IsoGene implementing the methods is available from the first author.