Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology
Editor-in-Chief: Stumpf, Michael P.H.
6 Issues per year
Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2012: 1.717
Rank 18 out of 117 in category Statistics & Probability in the 2012 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition
Mathematical Citation Quotient 2012: 0.07
Volume 12 (2013)
Volume 11 (2012)
Volume 10 (2011)
Volume 9 (2010)
Volume 8 (2009)
Volume 6 (2007)
Volume 5 (2006)
Volume 4 (2005)
Volume 3 (2004)
Volume 2 (2003)
Volume 1 (2002)
Most Downloaded Articles
- A General Framework for Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis by Zhang, Bin and Horvath, Steve
- Linear Models and Empirical Bayes Methods for Assessing Differential Expression in Microarray Experiments by Smyth, Gordon K
- Detecting Differential Expression in RNA-sequence Data Using Quasi-likelihood with Shrunken Dispersion Estimates by Lund, Steven P./ Nettleton, Dan/ McCarthy, Davis J. and Smyth, Gordon K.
- A Shrinkage Approach to Large-Scale Covariance Matrix Estimation and Implications for Functional Genomics by Schäfer, Juliane and Strimmer, Korbinian
- Normalization, bias correction, and peak calling for ChIP-seq by Diaz, Aaron/ Park, Kiyoub/ Lim, Daniel A. and Song, Jun S.
An Internal Calibration Method for Protein-Array Studies
1Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
2Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
3University of Arkansas
4University of Washington
5Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
6Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Citation Information: Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology. Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1544-6115, DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1506, January 2010
- Published Online:
Nuisance factors in a protein-array study add obfuscating variation to spot intensity measurements, diminishing the accuracy and precision of protein concentration predictions. The effects of nuisance factors may be reduced by design of experiments, and by estimating and then subtracting nuisance effects. Estimated nuisance effects also inform about the quality of the study and suggest refinements for future studies.We demonstrate a method to reduce nuisance effects by incorporating a non-interfering internal calibration in the study design and its complemental analysis of variance. We illustrate this method by applying a chip-level internal calibration in a biomarker discovery study.The variability of sample intensity estimates was reduced 16% to 92% with a median of 58%; confidence interval widths were reduced 8% to 70% with a median of 35%. Calibration diagnostics revealed processing nuisance trends potentially related to spot print order and chip location on a slide.The accuracy and precision of a protein-array study may be increased by incorporating a non-interfering internal calibration. Internal calibration modeling diagnostics improve confidence in study results and suggest process steps that may need refinement. Though developed for our protein-array studies, this internal calibration method is applicable to other targeted array-based studies.