Etracker Debug:
	et_pagename = "Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology|sagmb|C|[EN]"
	
        
Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology

Editor-in-Chief: Stumpf, Michael P.H.

6 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2013: 1.055
Rank 48 out of 119 in category Statistics & Probability in the 2013 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

VolumeIssuePage

Normalization, bias correction, and peak calling for ChIP-seq

Aaron Diaz1 / Kiyoub Park2 / Daniel A. Lim3 / Jun S. Song4

1University of California, San Francisco

2University of California, San Francisco

3University of California, San Francisco

4University of California, San Francisco

Citation Information: Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology. Volume 11, Issue 3, ISSN (Online) 1544-6115, DOI: 10.1515/1544-6115.1750, March 2012

Publication History

Published Online:
2012-03-31

Next-generation sequencing is rapidly transforming our ability to profile the transcriptional, genetic, and epigenetic states of a cell. In particular, sequencing DNA from the immunoprecipitation of protein-DNA complexes (ChIP-seq) and methylated DNA (MeDIP-seq) can reveal the locations of protein binding sites and epigenetic modifications. These approaches contain numerous biases which may significantly influence the interpretation of the resulting data. Rigorous computational methods for detecting and removing such biases are still lacking. Also, multi-sample normalization still remains an important open problem. This theoretical paper systematically characterizes the biases and properties of ChIP-seq data by comparing 62 separate publicly available datasets, using rigorous statistical models and signal processing techniques. Statistical methods for separating ChIP-seq signal from background noise, as well as correcting enrichment test statistics for sequence-dependent and sonication biases, are presented. Our method effectively separates reads into signal and background components prior to normalization, improving the signal-to-noise ratio. Moreover, most peak callers currently use a generic null model which suffers from low specificity at the sensitivity level requisite for detecting subtle, but true, ChIP enrichment. The proposed method of determining a cell type-specific null model, which accounts for cell type-specific biases, is shown to be capable of achieving a lower false discovery rate at a given significance threshold than current methods.

Keywords: ChIP-seq; wavelets; regression; normalization; order statistics

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.