Biogerontologist Aubrey de Grey has suggested that one of the reasons we as a society invest so little in research on combating aging is because we are in an intellectual trance. We think the effort will be futile: aging is immutable, so why try? A healthy skepticism can be a good thing but it is a major mistake to bet against the irresistible force of inexorable technological progress. Over the next few decades, nanotechnology will come to play a pivotal role in the solution to the problem of human aging. Medical nanorobotics, if it can be made to work, can unquestionably offer convenient solutions to all known causes of age-related damage and most likely can also successfully address any new causes of senescence that remain undiscovered today.

Editor-in-Chief: Cutter, Anthony Mark
1 Issue per year
Issues
Volume 6 (2012)
Volume 5 (2011)
Volume 3 (2009)
Volume 1 (2007)
Most Downloaded Articles
- In Support of Human Enhancement by Chan, Sarah and Harris, John
- The Ethics of Autonomous Military Robots by Borenstein, Jason
- Ethics of Human Enhancement: 25 Questions & Answers by Allhoff, Fritz/ Lin, Patrick/ Moor, James and Weckert, John
- Future Issues with Robots and Cyborgs by Warwick, Kevin
- Public Perceptions and Biobanking: What Does the Research Really Say? by Rachul, Christen/ McGuire, Amy and Caulfield, Timothy
Medical Nanorobotics: Breaking the Trance of Futility in Life Extension Research (A Reply to de Grey)
Robert A. Freitas Jr.
1Institute for Molecular Manufacturing
Citation Information: Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology. Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1941-6008, DOI: 10.2202/1941-6008.1022, December 2007
Publication History:
- Published Online:
- 2007-12-22
Keywords: nanotechnology; nanomedicine; nanorobotics; life extension; enhancement


















Comments (0)