In this paper, we are concerned with the ethical implications of the distinction between natural reproduction (via sexual intercourse) and reproduction that requires assistance (either medical or social). We argue that the current practice of enforcing regulations on the latter but not on the former means of reproduction is ethically unjustified. It is not defensible to tolerate parental ignorance or abuse in natural reproduction and subsequently in natural parenting, whilst submitting assisted reproduction and parenting to invasive scrutiny. Our proposal is to guarantee equal (ethical and legal) treatment to people engaging in either form of reproduction or parenting.

Editor-in-Chief: Cutter, Anthony Mark
1 Issue per year
Issues
Volume 6 (2012)
Volume 5 (2011)
Volume 3 (2009)
Volume 1 (2007)
Most Downloaded Articles
- In Support of Human Enhancement by Chan, Sarah and Harris, John
- The Ethics of Autonomous Military Robots by Borenstein, Jason
- Ethics of Human Enhancement: 25 Questions & Answers by Allhoff, Fritz/ Lin, Patrick/ Moor, James and Weckert, John
- Future Issues with Robots and Cyborgs by Warwick, Kevin
- Public Perceptions and Biobanking: What Does the Research Really Say? by Rachul, Christen/ McGuire, Amy and Caulfield, Timothy
Natural versus Assisted Reproduction: In Search of Fairness
Daniela E Cutas / Lisa Bortolotti
1University of Gothenburg
1University of Birmingham
Citation Information: Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology. Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1941-6008, DOI: 10.2202/1941-6008.1109, February 2010
Publication History:
- Published Online:
- 2010-02-10
Keywords: reproductive rights; parenting; assisted reproduction; adoption; pro-reproductive culture; fairness


















Comments (0)