The symbolosphere, conceptualization, language, and neo-dualism : Semiotica Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Semiotica

Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies / Revue de l'Association Internationale de Sémiotique

Editor-in-Chief: Danesi, Marcel


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.275
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.661
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.191

149,00 € / $224.00 / £112.00*

Online
ISSN
1613-3692
See all formats and pricing
Select Volume and Issue
Loading journal volume and issue information...

The symbolosphere, conceptualization, language, and neo-dualism

Robert K. Logan / John H. Schumann

Citation Information: Semiotica. Volume 2005, Issue 155, Pages 201–214, ISSN (Online) 1613-3692, ISSN (Print) 0037-1998, DOI: 10.1515/semi.2005.2005.155.1-4.201, October 2008

Publication History

Published Online:
2008-10-27

Abstract

It is shown that Schumann’s notion of the Symbolosphere, the non-physical world of symbolic relationships and Logan’s (2000a) Extended Mind model in which the mind is defined as the brain plus language entail a form of dualism. A distinction is made between the symbolosphere, which includes the human mind and all its thoughts and communication processes such as language and the physiosphere, which is simply the physical world and includes the human brain. No distinction is made between substance and property dualism, hence the use of the term neo-dualism. The neo-dualistic approach is justified on the basis that at our current understanding of neuroscience is unable to connect the functions of the mind with the actions of the brain and hence it makes sense from a practical point of view to distinguish between these two levels of phenomena. The neo-dualism formulated here is also used to critique strong AI and deconstructionism.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.