Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
October 2008
ISSN:
1613-3692
DOI:
10.1515/semi.2005.2005.155.1-4.201

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 797.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 1196.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 957.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 1436.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

People who viewed this also viewed

Semiotica

Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies / Revue de l'Association Internationale de Sémiotique

Editor-in-Chief: Danesi, Marcel

5 Issues per year

ERIH category 2011: INT2

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

The symbolosphere, conceptualization, language, and neo-dualism

Robert K. Logan / John H. Schumann

Citation Information: Semiotica. Volume 2005, Issue 155, Pages 201–214, ISSN (Online) 1613-3692, ISSN (Print) 0037-1998, DOI: 10.1515/semi.2005.2005.155.1-4.201, October 2008

Publication History:
Published Online:
2008-10-27

Abstract

It is shown that Schumann’s notion of the Symbolosphere, the non-physical world of symbolic relationships and Logan’s (2000a) Extended Mind model in which the mind is defined as the brain plus language entail a form of dualism. A distinction is made between the symbolosphere, which includes the human mind and all its thoughts and communication processes such as language and the physiosphere, which is simply the physical world and includes the human brain. No distinction is made between substance and property dualism, hence the use of the term neo-dualism. The neo-dualistic approach is justified on the basis that at our current understanding of neuroscience is unable to connect the functions of the mind with the actions of the brain and hence it makes sense from a practical point of view to distinguish between these two levels of phenomena. The neo-dualism formulated here is also used to critique strong AI and deconstructionism.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.