Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Statistics & Risk Modeling

with Applications in Finance and Insurance

Editor-in-Chief: Stelzer, Robert

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.105

Mathematical Citation (MCQ) Quotient 2014: 0.14

99,00 € / $149.00 / £75.00*

See all formats and pricing
Select Volume and Issue
Loading journal volume and issue information...

Risk measurement with equivalent utility principles

Michel Denuit / Jan Dhaene / Marc Goovaerts / Rob Kaas / Roger Laeven

Citation Information: Statistics & Decisions. Volume 24, Issue 1/2006, Pages 1–25, ISSN (Print) 0721-2631, DOI: 10.1524/stnd.2006.24.1.1, September 2009

Publication History

Published Online:


Risk measures have been studied for several decades in the actuarial literature, where they appeared under the guise of premium calculation principles. Risk measures and properties that risk measures should satisfy have recently received considerable attention in the financial mathematics literature. Mathematically, a risk measure is a mapping from a class of random variables to the real line. Economically, a risk measure should capture the preferences of the decision-maker.

This paper complements the study initiated in Denuit, Dhaene & Van Wouwe (1999) and considers several theories for decision under uncertainty: the classical expected utility paradigm, Yaari's dual approach, maximin expected utility theory, Choquet expected utility theory and Quiggin's rank-dependent utility theory. Building on the actuarial equivalent utility pricing principle, broad classes of risk measures are generated, of which most classical risk measures appear to be particular cases. This approach shows that most risk measures studied recently in the financial mathematics literature disregard the utility concept (i.e., correspond to linear utilities), restricting their applicability. Some alternatives proposed in the literature are discussed.

Key words and phrases: risk measures; theories for decision under uncertainty; axiomatic characterization; equivalent utility; risk aversion

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Gebhard Geiger
European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, Volume 246, Number 3, Page 944
Nelson A. Uhan
European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, Volume 243, Number 2, Page 637
Adriana Piazza and Bernardo K. Pagnoncelli
Journal of Economics, 2015, Volume 115, Number 2, Page 175
Jaume Belles-Sampera, Montserrat Guillén, and Miguel Santolino
Risk Analysis, 2014, Volume 34, Number 1, Page 121
Hans Peter Wächter and Thomas Mazzoni
European Journal of Operational Research, 2013, Volume 229, Number 2, Page 487
Jaume Belles-Sampera, José M. Merigó, Montserrat Guillén, and Miguel Santolino
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2013, Volume 52, Number 2, Page 411
Mario V. Wüthrich, Paul Embrechts, and Andreas Tsanakas
Statistics & Risk Modeling, 2011, Volume 28, Number 4, Page 299
Andreas Tsanakas
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2009, Volume 44, Number 2, Page 268
Edward Furman and Ričardas Zitikis
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2008, Volume 43, Number 2, Page 263
İ. Dimitriyadis and Ü.N. Öney
Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2009, Volume 233, Number 1, Page 51
Stefan Kassberger and Thomas Liebmann
Journal of Banking & Finance, 2012, Volume 36, Number 5, Page 1304
Marc J. Goovaerts, Rob Kaas, and Roger J.A. Laeven
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2010, Volume 47, Number 3, Page 294
Ka Chun Cheung
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2010, Volume 47, Number 2, Page 130
Rania Hentati and Jean-Luc Prigent
Statistics & Decisions, 2011, Volume 28, Number 1
Alejandro Balbás, José Garrido, and Silvia Mayoral
Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 2009, Volume 11, Number 3, Page 385

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.