Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
September 2006
ISSN:
1860-7349
DOI:
10.1515/TEXT.2006.024

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 453.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 680.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 544.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 816.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Text & Talk

An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies

Ed. by Sarangi, Srikant

6 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2010: 0.493
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.664
ERIH category 2011: INT1

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Intertextuality in interaction: Reframing family arguments in public and private

cor1*Address for correspondence:

Citation Information: Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies. Volume 26, Issue 4-5, Pages 597–617, ISSN (Online) 1860-7349, ISSN (Print) 1860-7330, DOI: 10.1515/TEXT.2006.024, September 2006

Publication History:
Published Online:
2006-09-15

Abstract

Building on Becker's notion of prior text and Bakhtin's of dialogicality, I explore intertextuality in family discourse by tracing how three couples' conflicts about domestic responsibilities are recycled, reframed, and rekeyed over time, both between each other and in conversation with others: in one case with a friend, and in another with the couple's child. I use the term ‘recycling’ for situations where a topic is closed then arises again later in the same or a different conversation; ‘reframing’ for a change in what the conversation is about; and ‘rekeying’ for a change in the tone or tenor of an interaction. I trace a conflict in each of three families—the first two briefly, the third at length—in order to examine how speakers negotiate conflicts about the division of household responsibilities. In the third example, analysis helps explain why the issue of household responsibilities carries so much weight. In all three examples, restoring harmony was accomplished in part by reframing in a humorous key, and in ways that reinforced the speakers' shared family identities. The paper thus demonstrates how the abstract concept, intertextuality, actually works in everyday interaction.

Keywords: intertextuality; family discourse; framing; conflict talk; interactional sociolinguistics

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.