Etracker Debug:
	et_pagename = "Text & Talk|text|C|[EN]"
	
        
Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Text & Talk

An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies

Ed. by Sarangi, Srikant

6 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2013: 0.200
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.586
ERIH category 2011: INT1

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

A study of interruption in Chinese criminal courtroom discourse

Meizhen Liao1

1Professor of linguistics in the School of Foreign Languages, Huazhong Normal University.

School of Foreign Languages, Huazhong Normal University, Wuhan 430079, PR China 〈 〉.

Citation Information: Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies. Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 175–199, ISSN (Online) 1860-7349, ISSN (Print) 1860-7330, DOI: 10.1515/TEXT.2009.008, March 2009

Publication History

Published Online:
2009-03-18

Abstract

This article is based on a corpus of transcripts of four criminal courtroom trials in China. It investigates interruption in the Chinese criminal courtroom discourse as a highly institutionalized and strongly goal-oriented discourse. The study focuses on the number, functions, causes, and distribution of interruptions as well as their correlation with the Chinese legal system and legal culture. Interruptions in Chinese courtroom trials are substantially asymmetrical in terms of the number, functions, and causes in the sense that prosecutors interrupt the most and defense lawyers the least, with judges being in the middle but somewhat closer to prosecutors. A defendant is the most interrupted party. The dominant side, represented by the judge and the prosecutor, interrupts to exercise control by stretching the Gricean maxims to the extreme. In contrast, a defendant interrupts mainly for cooperation or to insist on their right to speak. I also attempt to explain the imbalance by referring to the Chinese judicial system and legal culture and compare the interruption phenomena in Chinese criminal trials with those I observed in the United States.

Keywords:: interruption; criminal courtroom discourse; Chinese legal system and culture; discourse analysis

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.