Representing events and discourse; comments on Hamm, Kamp and van Lambalgen : Theoretical Linguistics

www.degruyter.com uses cookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience.
To understand more about cookies, tags, and tracking, see our Privacy Statement
I accept all cookies for the De Gruyter Online site

Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Theoretical Linguistics

An Open Peer Review Journal

Editor-in-Chief: Krifka, Manfred

Ed. by Gärtner, Hans-Martin


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2014: 1.273
Rank 27 out of 171 in category Linguistics in the 2014 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.416
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2014: 0.378
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2014: 0.694

ERIH category 2011: INT1

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Representing events and discourse; comments on Hamm, Kamp and van Lambalgen

Tim Fernando

Citation Information: Theoretical Linguistics. Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 57–64, ISSN (Online) 1613-4060, ISSN (Print) 0301-4428, DOI: 10.1515/TL.2006.004, September 2006

Publication History

Published Online:
2006-09-15

Abstract

In [HKL00] (henceforth HKL), Hamm, Kamp and van Lambalgen declare “there is no opposition between formal and cognitive semantics,” notwithstanding the realist/mentalist divide. That divide separates two sides Jackendoff has (in [Jac96], following Chomsky) labeled E(xternalized)-semantics, relating language to a reality independent of speakers, and I(nternalized)-semantics, revolving around mental representations and thought. Although formal semanticists have (following David Lewis) traditionally leaned towards E-semantics, it is reasonable to apply formal methods also to I-semantics. This point is made clear in HKL via two computational approaches to natural language semantics, Discourse Representation Theory (DRT, [KR93]) and the Event Calculus (EC) presented in [LH05]. In this short note, I wish to raise certain questions about EC that can be traced to the applicability of formal methods to E-semantics and I-semantics alike. These opposing orientations suggest different notions of time, event and representation.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Tim Fernando
Information and Computation, 2009, Volume 207, Number 10, Page 980
[2]
Tim Fernando
Linguistics and Philosophy, 2007, Volume 30, Number 5, Page 527

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.