Money undergirds market exchange, but the social significance of money goes well beyond the obvious importance of its highly uneven distribution in modern market economies. In addition, modern money imposes an ostensibly precise and unidimensional valuation on social products, processes and relations that often conflicts with other modes of social valuation. In this regard, monetarization is a particular instance of quantification. Money’s status as an official economic metric is the result of a long, contingent, and uneven historical process. Given alternative forms of valuation, people manage and constrain the commensurability of money through a variety of individual, institutional and organizational practices (often akin to "earmarking"). The social reception of money is active, not passive. A variety of examples are discussed to illustrate and develop these points.

Editor-in-Chief: Hannes, Sharon
2 Issues per year
Issues
Volume 14 (2013)
Volume 13 (2012)
Volume 12 (2011)
Volume 11 (2010)
Volume 10 (2009)
Volume 9 (2008)
Volume 8 (2007)
Volume 7 (2006)
Volume 6 (2005)
Volume 5 (2004)
Volume 3 (2002)
Volume 2 (2001)
Most Downloaded Articles
- On the Use and Abuse of Blackstone -- A Comment on Professor Schorr by Kreitner, Roy
- Global Investment Regulation and Sovereign Funds by Chalamish, Efraim
- Targeted Killing by Statman, Daniel
- Corporate Governance under State Control: The Chinese Experience by Wang, Zhaofeng
- Governments as Investors of Last Resort: Comparative Credit Crisis Case-Studies by Hertig, Gerard
The Meanings of Money: A Sociological Perspective
Bruce G Carruthers1
1Northwestern University, b-carruthers@northwestern.edu.
Citation Information: Theoretical Inquiries in Law. Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 51–74, ISSN (Online) 1565-3404, DOI: 10.2202/1565-3404.1236, January 2010
Publication History:
- Published Online:
- 2010-01-14


















Comments (0)