Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

49,00 € / $74.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
June 2010
ISSN:
1565-3404
DOI:
10.2202/1565-3404.1259

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 49.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 74.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 176.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 237.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 212.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 285.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Tax Levels, Structures, and Reforms: Convergence or Persistence

Neil Brooks1 / Thaddeus Hwong2

1Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, Canada

2Faculty of Liberal Arts and Professional Studies, York University, Canada; Taxation Law and Policy Research Institute, Monash University.

Citation Information: Theoretical Inquiries in Law. Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 791–821, ISSN (Online) 1565-3404, DOI: 10.2202/1565-3404.1259, June 2010

Publication History:
Published Online:
2010-06-27

One of the central issues in comparative law and political economy is whether the forces of globalization will result in the convergence of public policies across countries. Noting in particular that taxes collected still cover a considerable range across industrialized countries — from a low of 20% of GDP to a high of 50% — some have argued that globalization has not resulted in a loss of tax sovereignty. However, following a review of the evidence, in this Article we conclude that globalization has had significant but subtle effects on tax levels and structures. Moreover, these pressures will make it increasingly difficult for countries to raise revenue to finance new public needs and to structure their tax systems in order to achieve a more socially acceptable distribution of income than what market forces dictate. Tax levels in most countries have remained essentially flat over the past twenty years, but there is a host of reasons for thinking they would have continued to rise were it not for the pressures of globalization. Statutory corporate tax rates have declined dramatically and, although corporate tax revenues have remained robust, this has been due to factors unrelated to deliberate tax policy choices. Personal marginal tax rates have also declined sharply and tax revenues have been increasingly raised by regressive consumption taxes. These trends stem from tax competition brought on by the forces of globalization, not from changing ideas or other political variables. In this Article we conclude that in order to prevent tax competition from completely eroding the ability of countries to fashion their own tax systems, there will have to be considerable cooperation among the major countries and some harmonization of aspects of their tax systems, particularly as they apply to footloose factors of production.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.