Discussion paper on Gilbert Lazard's “On the status of linguistics with particular regard to typology” : The Linguistic Review

www.degruyter.com uses cookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience.
To understand more about cookies, tags, and tracking, see our Privacy Statement
I accept all cookies for the De Gruyter Online site

Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

The Linguistic Review

Editor-in-Chief: Hulst, Harry


IMPACT FACTOR 2014: 0.211
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.470

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.813
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2014: 0.843
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2014: 0.444

ERIH category 2011: INT1

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

Discussion paper on Gilbert Lazard's “On the status of linguistics with particular regard to typology”

Paolo Ramat1

1.

Citation Information: The Linguistic Review. Volume 21, Issue 3-4, Pages 413–420, ISSN (Online) 1613-3676, ISSN (Print) 0167-6318, DOI: 10.1515/tlir.2004.21.3-4.413, July 2005

Publication History

Published Online:
2005-07-27

Abstract

This paper deals with the concept of internal versus external explanation in linguistics and the difficulty of drawing a clear-cut dividing line. Crosslinguistic comparison helps us to understand what may be considered as strictly pertaining to the linguistic dimension or to a larger cognitive frame. Linguistic categories are then discussed in this frame of reference and a scheme is proposed where the notion of “category” does not apply to concepts such as “passive”, “perfect”, or “subject”. Finally it is maintained that the classical “parts-of-speech” theory is still a valuable tool for crosslinguistic comparison in a typological perspective.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.