Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
December 2005
ISSN:
1613-3676
DOI:
10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.199

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 348.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 521.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 418.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 626.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Editor-in-Chief: Hulst, Harry

4 Issues per year

Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 0.613
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.077
Rank 71 out of 161 in category Linguistics in the 2011 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition
ERIH category 2011: INT1

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

What language creation in the manual modality tells us about the foundations of language

Susan Goldin-Meadow

Citation Information: The Linguistic Review. Volume 22, Issue 2-4, Pages 199–225, ISSN (Online) 1613-3676, ISSN (Print) 0167-6318, DOI: 10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.199, December 2005

Publication History:
Published Online:
2005-12-06

Abstract

Universal Grammar offers a set of hypotheses about the biases children bring to language-learning. But testing these hypotheses is difficult, particularly if we look only at language-learning under typical circumstances. Children are influenced by the linguistic input to which they are exposed at the earliest stages of language-learning. Their biases will therefore be obscured by the input they receive. A clearer view of the child’s preparation for language comes from observing children who are not exposed to linguistic input. Deaf children whose hearing losses prevent them from learning the spoken language that surrounds them, and whose hearing parents have not yet exposed them to sign language, nevertheless communicate with the hearing individuals in their worlds and use gestures, called homesigns, to do so. This article explores which properties of Universal Grammar can be found in the deaf children’s homesign systems, and thus tests linguistic theory against acquisition data.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.