Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
January 2011
ISSN:
1613-3676
DOI:
10.1515/tlir.2010.012

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 348.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 521.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 418.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 626.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Editor-in-Chief: Hulst, Harry

4 Issues per year

Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 0.613
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.077
Rank 71 out of 161 in category Linguistics in the 2011 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition
ERIH category 2011: INT1

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Projective vs. interpretational properties of nuclear accents and the phonology of contrastive focus in Greek

1University of Athens

2University of Potsdam

Citation Information: The Linguistic Review. Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 319–346, ISSN (Online) 1613-3676, ISSN (Print) 0167-6318, DOI: 10.1515/tlir.2010.012, January 2011

Publication History:
Published Online:
2011-01-28

Abstract

Nuclear accents have two interesting properties. First, they have a projective property, i.e., they may refer to a focus domain that encompasses a higher syntactic projection. Second, at least for some languages, nuclear accents may have an interpretational property, i.e., they may have alternative realizations that reveal particular interpretations, such as contrast, correction, surprise, etc. The present article examines the interaction between the projective and the interpretational properties of nuclear pitch accents. Based on an experimental study on Greek, we show that the nuclear accent that is interpreted as ‘contrastive’ refers to a local focus domain, i.e., it is not projected to higher layers of the constituent structure. Furthermore, our experimental findings show that these properties interact with syntactic and prosodic markedness, in a way that the canonical word order and the unmarked accentual structure are felicitous in a larger array of contexts than the marked syntactic and accentual configurations.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.