Volume 9 (2013)
Volume 8 (2012)
Volume 7 (2011)
Volume 6 (2010)
Volume 5 (2009)
Most Downloaded Articles
- The Invisible Violence of Celebrity Humanitarianism: Soft Images and Hard Words in the Making and Unmaking of Africa by Yrjölä, Riina
- Historical Institutionalism and Comparative Federalism by Broschek, Jörg
- Sources of Euroscepticism: Utilitarian Interest, Social Distrust, National Identity and Institutional Distrust by Abts, Koen/ Heerwegh, Dirk and Swyngedouw, Marc
- Political Science: Witchcraft or Craftsmanship? Standards for Good Research by Nørgaard, Asbjørn S.
- The Takeoff after Lisbon: The Practical and Theoretical Implications of Differentiated Integration in the EU by Koller, Boglárka
The Justification of Political Obligation
1Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Hungary, (email)
Citation Information: World Political Science Review. Volume 5, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1935-6226, DOI: 10.2202/1935-6226.1056, January 2009
- Published Online:
Empirically, there are many types of justification of political loyalty. Political theory helps one think about the most popular and empirically effective conceptions more consistently. To achieve this, the essay is structured around three main questions that will be asked of six typical strategies of justification. First, how strong is the political obligation that the political community can expect from its citizens? Second, how is political obligation related to other duties and obligations? The third question is to what degree can it be extended over to other citizens? The six justifications to be considered are the following: (1) conflict resolution, (2) mutual advantages, (3) natural or identity-based bonds, (4) a universal moral-political ideal, (5) participation (republicanism), and (6) mission. Political philosophers and citizens with strong political preferences will see how and to what extent their preferences are reconcilable with one or more of these strategies of justifying political obligation.