Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

49,00 € / $74.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
July 2007
ISSN:
1612-961X
DOI:
10.1515/zach.8.2.317

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 49.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 74.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 202.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 303.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 243.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 364.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

European Science Foundation ranking A

Ed. by Brennecke, Hanns Christof / Drecoll, Volker Henning / Markschies, Christoph

Together with Elm, Susanna / Meier, Mischa / Perrone, Lorenzo / Pollmann, Karla / Riedweg, Christoph / Schöllgen, Georg / / Wischmeyer, Wolfgang

In cooperation with Gemeinhardt, Peter

3 Issues per year

VolumeIssuePage

La préhistoire de la controverse filioquiste

Xavier Morales1

1

Citation Information: Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum. Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 317–331, ISSN (Online) 1612-961X, ISSN (Print) 0949-9571, DOI: 10.1515/zach.8.2.317, July 2007

Publication History:
Published Online:
2007-07-31

Abstract

The article draws the origins of the filioquist controversy back to the theology of Asterius the Sophist and his refutation by Marcellus of Ancyra (condemned in 336). The oriental theology of the Fourth century provides a sort of prehistorical background to the formula: “The Spirit proceeds from the Father by the Son”. The first systematical pneumatology, delivered by Athanasius of Alexandria in his Letters to Serapion (ca. 360), similarly expresses a intermediary role of the Son in the mission of the Spirit, in trying to respect literally the johannine data. Athanasius' attempt is of particular interest, in as much as it has been later advocated as a testimony for the filioquist formula, singularly by Nicephorus Blemmydes (1197-1272) and George of Cyprus (1241-1290). Actually, later interpretations reveal the ambiguity of Athanasius' own formulations.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.