Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

49,00 € / $74.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
May 2009
ISSN:
1612-961X
DOI:
10.1515/ZAC.2008.031

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 49.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 74.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 202.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 303.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 243.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 364.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

European Science Foundation ranking A

Ed. by Brennecke, Hanns Christof / Drecoll, Volker Henning / Markschies, Christoph

Together with Elm, Susanna / Meier, Mischa / Perrone, Lorenzo / Pollmann, Karla / Riedweg, Christoph / Schöllgen, Georg / / Wischmeyer, Wolfgang

In cooperation with Gemeinhardt, Peter

3 Issues per year

VolumeIssuePage

La lettre 177,16-18 de saint Augustin, écho atténué à un conflit d'exégèse patristique au temps de la controverse pélagienne?

Laurence Dalmon

Citation Information: Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum. Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 544–561, ISSN (Online) 1612-961X, ISSN (Print) 0949-9571, DOI: 10.1515/ZAC.2008.031, May 2009

Publication History:
Published Online:
2009-05-13

ABSTRACT

Epistula 177 (written in autumn 416 AD73) was sent to the Roman bishop Innocent 1st to convince him of condemning pelagian heresy. Epistula 177,16-18, which are devoted to the topic of impeccantia, show signs of a exegetical duel which then opposed Augustine and Pelagius concerning an excerpt from the ambrosial commentary of Saint Luke's (Ambrosius, Expositio euangelii secundum Lucam I 17). The contemporary writings of both opponents quite reflect the topicality and vehemence of this debate, which is incidentally mentioned in an excursus, in Epistula 177. Why such a discretion? We shall work upon a personal translation of the text mentioned above. After refocusing the debate on impeccantia, in the broader context of the pelagian controversy, we shall study the issues of the dispute around the ambrosial authority; we shall then try to understand why the signatories of Epistula 177 thought appropriate of toning down this conflict of interpretation in a letter to Rome.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.