Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

43,00 € / $60.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added.
Publication Date:
15 09 2011
ISSN:
1612-961X
DOI:
10.1515/zac.2011.004

See all formats and pricing

Print
List price
Euro [D] 192.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 288.00 *
Online
List price
Euro [D] 43.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 60.00 *
Print + Online
List price
Euro [D] 221.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 332.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added.

European Science Foundation ranking A

Ed. by Brennecke, Hanns Christof / Drecoll, Volker Henning / Markschies, Christoph

Together with Elm, Susanna / Meier, Mischa / Perrone, Lorenzo / Pollmann, Karla / Riedweg, Christoph / Schöllgen, Georg / / Wischmeyer, Wolfgang

In cooperation with Gemeinhardt, Peter

3 Issues per year

Die Patristik um 1911 in ihrem Verhältnis zur Religionsgeschichte

1Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Theologische Fakultät, Platz der Göttinger Sieben 2, D-37073 Göttingen

Citation Information: Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum. Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 75–98, ISSN (Online) 1612-961X, ISSN (Print) 0949-9571, DOI: 10.1515/zac.2011.004, September 2011

Publication History: Published Online: 01/03/2012

ABSTRACT

The present paper deals with the debates about the History of Religion, which emerged at the University of Göttingen around 1890, within Church History, especially Patristics, in Germany in the early 20th century. The inaugural speech of Adolf Harnack as head of the University of Berlin in 1901 serves as a prominent example of outright rejection of special chairs of Religious Sciences, while the methodological impact of the History of Religion is duly appreciated. In order to broaden the scope of the analysis, contemporary lectures given by Alfred Hegler and Adolf Jülicher are reviewed, which indicate that patristic scholars did not see the History of Religions as a fundamental challenge to their ongoing work. Finally, the encyclopedia Religion in Geschichte and Gegenwart aimed at furthering research in terms of the History of Religion; however, the patristic articles oscillate between tradition and innovation in method and focus. In sum, patristic research was enriched by the new analytical perspective of the History of Religion, but did not undergo a thorough transformation in the years around 1911.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.