Ikonizität in Personalpronomina : Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft

www.degruyter.com uses cookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience.
To understand more about cookies, tags, and tracking, see our Privacy Statement
I accept all cookies for the De Gruyter Online site

Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft


IMPACT FACTOR 2014: 0.231
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.581

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.123
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2014: 0.473
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2014: 0.176

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

Ikonizität in Personalpronomina

Johannes Helmbrecht1

1.

Citation Information: Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft. Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 211–244, ISSN (Online) 1613-3706, ISSN (Print) 0721-9067, DOI: 10.1515/zfsw.2004.23.2.211, July 2005

Publication History

Received:
14. April 2003
Revised:
11. Juni 2004
Published Online:
2005-07-27

Abstract

It has been shown by Haiman and many others within the functional-typological framework that iconicity (in particular diagrammatic iconicity) plays a significant role in the creation of complex linguistic signs in the domain of syntax and morphology. The present paper provides an answer to the question in which way and to which degree iconicity is involved in the emergence and grammaticalization of personal pronouns. In the first part, a theoretical framework for the identification of iconic structures in personal pronouns is developed. The second part shows which properties of personal pronouns and their paradigms are iconic and which properties are not. In the third part, it is argued that a functional explanation of the formal gestalt of personal pronouns and their paradigms has to assume at least two conflicting factors, iconicity (transparency of form facilitating cognitive processing) and the Empathy Hierarchy (resulting in the unmarkedness of the most salient person/number categories in discourse and the erosion of iconicity). The evidence provided leads to the conclusion that it is not possible to equate markedness with iconicity as is proposed within the framework of natural morphology.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[2]
Michael Cysouw
Morphology, 2011, Volume 21, Number 2, Page 419
[3]
Martin Haspelmath
Cognitive Linguistics, 2008, Volume 19, Number 1, Page 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.