Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter May 9, 2017

Member Corporations, Property Corporations, and Constitutional Rights

  • David Ciepley EMAIL logo

Abstract

Historically, a corporation was regarded as an artificial creation of law possessing only what rights and powers its constituting charter confers upon it. This “concession” or “grant” theory has been eclipsed, especially in the United States, by the view that the corporation is a mere association of natural persons, and that its rights are those of its “members” and “owners,” the shareholders, who, as persons and citizens, bring even constitutional rights to the corporation. This associational view rests on a triple confusion. First, it confuses the corporation (the rights-bearing corporate entity) with the corporate firm, which is associational, leaving the impression that the corporation can be reduced to natural persons. This underwrites the second confusion, that the business corporation is a member corporation, with the shareholders as members, when in fact it is a property corporation without members. The histories of the Dutch and English East India Companies are drawn on to explain the origins of this second confusion. Third, it confuses the member corporation with a partnership, when it imagines that the rights of the corporation are simply those of its individual shareholders. Instead, as maintained by the grant theory, a corporation should only receive such rights as are conferred on it by charter or statute on the basis of policy considerations.

Published Online: 2017-5-9
Published in Print: 2017-5-8

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/lehr-2017-0001/html
Scroll to top button