Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton April 30, 2021

The degree zero of digital interfaces: a semiotics of audiovisual archives online

  • Matteo Treleani EMAIL logo
From the journal Semiotica

Abstract

Interfaces have partially replaced editors. They now administer and have industrialized the processes of content circulation. Web platforms mediatize cultural memory and one example of this is that of online audiovisual archives which are a paradigmatic case involving interfaces mediating our image of the past. Therefore, their role as an enunciative framework is clearly worthy of thought and study. We will thus use a semiotic approach based on the starting hypothesis that digital interfaces shape our belief systems through a discursive framing of content to which they give access. By analyzing two case studies, we will argue that the transparency of interfaces appears to recall the notion of “mechanical objectivity” and thus refashion the reliability of the archives. However, a final counter-analysis of a document read in the framework of an on-site consultation invites us to reshape our considerations and enlarge the perspective from semiotic visual analysis to include the social processes linked to the publication of digital heritage.


Corresponding author: Matteo Treleani, Université Côte d’Azur, Nice, France, E-mail:

References

Agamben, Giorgio. 2009. The signature of all things: On method. Cambridge, MA: Zone.Search in Google Scholar

Bachimont, Bruno. 2014. Le nominalisme de la culture: Questions posées par les enjeux du numérique. In Bernard Stiegler (dir.), Digital studies: Organologie des savoirs et technologies de la connaissance, 63–78. Limoges: Fyp éditions.Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1953. Le degré zéro de l’écriture. Paris: Seuil.Search in Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter. 1969. The work of art at the age of its mechanical reproduction. In Illuminations: Essays and reflections, 2017–2253. New York: Schocken.Search in Google Scholar

Bolter, Richard & Jay David Grusin. 1999. Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.1108/ccij.1999.4.4.208.1Search in Google Scholar

Borges, Priscila Monteiro & Renira Rampazzo Gambarato. 2019. The role of beliefs and behavior on Facebook: A semiotic approach to algorithms, fake news, and transmedia journalism. International Journal of Communication 13(1). 603–618.Search in Google Scholar

Bonaccorsi, Julia. 2017. Le monde de l’Open data: Les jeux sémiotiques et esthétiques de la ‘visualisation’ comme rhétorique de la transparence. In Sémir Badir & François Provenzano (dirs.), Pratiques émergentes et pensée du medium, 131–149. Paris: l’Harmattan.Search in Google Scholar

Burgess, Jean. 2015. From “broadcast yourself” to “follow your interests”: Making over social media. International Journal of Cultural Studies 18(3). 281–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877913513684.Search in Google Scholar

Cardon, Dominique. 2015. A quoi rêvent les algorithmes: Nos vies à l’heure des Big Data. Paris: Le Seuil.Search in Google Scholar

Casetti, Francesco. 2015. The Lumière galaxy: Seven keywords for the cinema to come. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/case17242Search in Google Scholar

Colas-Blaise, Marion. 2018. Remédiation et réenonciation: Opérations et régimes de sens. Interin 23(1). 64–84.10.35168/1980-5276.UTP.interin.2018.Vol23.N1.pp64-84Search in Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine & Peter Galison. 2007. Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 1995. Le mal d’archive: Impressions freudiennes. Paris: Galilée.Search in Google Scholar

de Leeuw, Sonja. 2012. European television history online: History and challenges. VIEW Journal of European Television History and Culture 1(1). 3–11. https://doi.org/10.18146/2213-0969.2012.jethc002.Search in Google Scholar

Doueihi, Milad. 2011. Digital cultures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.7202/1063058ar.Search in Google Scholar

Duranti, Luciana. 1995. Reliability and authenticity: The concepts and their implications. Archivaria 39. 5–10.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 2017. Sulle spalle dei giganti. Milano: La nave di Teseo.Search in Google Scholar

Ernst, Wolfgang. 2013. Digital memory and the archive. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. 2018. A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/6ef4df8b-4cea-11e8-be1d-01aa75ed71a1 (accessed 16 April 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Gabielkov, Maksym, Arthi Ramachandran, Augustin Chaintreau & Arnaud Legout. 2016. Social clicks: What and who gets read on Twitter? ACM SIGMETRICS - Performance Evaluation Review 44(1). 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1145/2964791.2901462.Search in Google Scholar

Galloway, Alexander R. 2012. The interface effect. New York: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gitelman, Lisa (ed.). 2013. Raw data is an oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9302.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Han, Byung-Chul. 2015. The transparency society. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9780804797511Search in Google Scholar

Hoskins, Andrew. 2009. The mediatization of memory. In Joanne Garde-Hansen, Andrew Hoskins & Anna Readings (eds.), Save as … digital memories, 27–43. London: Palgrave McMillan.10.1057/9780230239418_2Search in Google Scholar

Jeanneret, Yves. 2014. Critique de la trivialité: Les médiations de la communication, enjeux de pouvoir. Paris: Editions Non Standard.Search in Google Scholar

Jost, François. 2010. Que signifie parler de « réalité » pour la télévision? Télévision 1. 13–30. https://doi.org/10.3917/telev.001.0013.Search in Google Scholar

Lambert, Frédéric. 2014. Je sais bien mais quand même. Paris: Editions Non Standard.Search in Google Scholar

Landowski, Eric. 2005. Les interactions risquées. Actes Sémiotiques, 101–103. Limoges: PULIM.Search in Google Scholar

Manovich, Lev. 1999. The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Noordergraaf, Julia. 2010. Who knows television? Online access and the gatekeepers of knowledge. Critical Studies in Television 5(2). 1–19.10.7227/CST.5.2.3Search in Google Scholar

Pédauque, Roger T. 2009. La rédocumentarisation du monde. Paris: Cépèdues.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, vol. 8, C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number].Search in Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Daniel. 2013. Data before the fact. In Lisa Gitelman (ed.), Raw data is an oxymoron, 15–40. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9302.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Rouvroy, Antoinette & Bernard Stiegler. 2015. Le régime de vérité numérique. Socio 4. 113–140. https://doi.org/10.4000/socio.1251.Search in Google Scholar

Serres, Michel. 2012. Petite poucette. Paris: Editions Le Pommier.Search in Google Scholar

Stiegler, Bernard. 2018. La technique et le temps. Paris: Fayard.Search in Google Scholar

Treleani, Matteo. 2014. Mémoires audiovisuelles. Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal.10.4000/books.pum.2102Search in Google Scholar

Treleani, Matteo. 2017. Qu’est-ce que le patrimoine numérique? Lormont: Le Bord de l’Eau.Search in Google Scholar

Vitali Rosati, Marcello. 2018. On editorialization: Structuring space and authority in the digital age. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-04-18
Accepted: 2019-10-05
Published Online: 2021-04-30
Published in Print: 2021-07-27

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2019-0043/html
Scroll to top button