Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 11, 2017

A Perfect Match? Are Dogmatic Belief Systems Simply a Reconciliation of Cognitive and Emotional Human Needs?

  • Thomas Gries EMAIL logo and Veronika Müller EMAIL logo

Abstract

This paper uses theoretical and empirical literature of various disciplines to develop a conceptual framework for explaining violent social conflicts. This interdisciplinary framework identifies crucial individual and social mechanisms, and suggests three constitutive sets of elements that define the “anatomy of violent civil conflicts”: (i) we begin by considering the role of socio-economic and political conditions and subjective mental states that trigger cognitive and emotional demands such as the demand for safety, order, social belongingness, and self-esteem. (ii) To satisfy the emerging demands and to manage accrued negative emotions and subjectively experienced conflicts, individuals tend to search for reconciliation strategies. While direct physical solutions might offer a practical approach, particular mind-sets tend to provide a cognitive framework to understand and evaluate social reality. They absorb accrued negative emotions and deliver narratives for identification with like-minded individuals who share a set of ideas, goals, guidelines and interpretations. But beyond peaceful ideas, ideologies can be aggressive and totalitarian, such as Religious Fundamentalism, Right-Wing Extremism or Racism, covering irrevocable and static dogmas. (iii) In this case, the dogmatic ideological framework presents a clear, focused and guiding image of the world, which shapes a rigid pattern of coherence and contrast and which is perceived as a vital resource for motivation and recruitment. To understand at first the decision-making process of individuals, it is of vital importance to combine rational economic thinking with the dynamic processes of external threats, social belongingness and individual psychologic dispositions.

References

Anhut, R. (2005). Die Konflikttheorie der Desintegrationstheorie. In Sozialwissenschaftliche Konflikttheorien (pp. 381–407). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.10.1007/978-3-322-95688-0_19Search in Google Scholar

Bell, D. (1962). The end of ideology: On the exhaustion of political ideas in the fifties: With “The resumption of history in the new century”. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brandt, M. J., & Reyna, C. (2010). The role of prejudice and the need for closure in religious fundamentalism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(5), 715–725.10.1177/0146167210366306Search in Google Scholar

Caruso, R., & Schneider, F. (2011). The socio-economic determinants of terrorism and political violence in Western Europe (1994–2007). European Journal of Political Economy, 27, S37–S49.10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2011.02.003Search in Google Scholar

Dantschke, C. (2017). Attraktivität, Anziehungskraft und Akteure des politischen und militanten Salafismus in Deutschland. In Salafismus in Deutschland (pp. 61–76). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.10.1007/978-3-658-15097-6_4Search in Google Scholar

Diefenbach, H. (2009). Die Theorie der Rationalen Wahl oder „Rational Choice“-Theorie (RCT). Soziologische Paradigmen nach Talcott Parsons (pp. 239–290). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften .10.1007/978-3-531-91454-1_5Search in Google Scholar

Doosje, B., Loseman, A., & Bos, K. (2013). Determinants of radicalization of Islamic youth in the Netherlands: Personal uncertainty, perceived injustice, and perceived group threat. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), 586–604.10.1111/josi.12030Search in Google Scholar

El-Mafaalani, A. (2017). Provokation und Plausibilität–Eigenlogik und soziale Rahmung des jugendkulturellen Salafismus. In Salafismus in Deutschland (pp. 77–90). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.10.1007/978-3-658-15097-6_5Search in Google Scholar

Emerson, M. O., & Hartman, D. (2006). The rise of religious fundamentalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 127–144.10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123141Search in Google Scholar

Feddes, A. R., Mann, L., & Doosje, B. (2015). Increasing self‐esteem and empathy to prevent violent radicalization: A longitudinal quantitative evaluation of a resilience training focused on adolescents with a dual identity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(7), 400–411.10.1111/jasp.12307Search in Google Scholar

Gerber, J., & Wheeler, L. (2009). On being rejected: A meta-analysis of experimental research on rejection. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(5), 468–488.10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01158.xSearch in Google Scholar

Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 61–139.10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60016-7Search in Google Scholar

Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116.10.1007/s11211-007-0034-zSearch in Google Scholar

Hogg, M. A. (2014). From uncertainty to extremism: Social categorization and identity processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 338–342.10.1177/0963721414540168Search in Google Scholar

Hogg, M. A., Adelman, J. R., & Blagg, R. D. (2010). Religion in the face of uncertainty: An uncertainty-identity theory account of religiousness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 72–83.10.1177/1088868309349692Search in Google Scholar

Hogg, M. A., Sherman, D. K., Dierselhuis, J., Maitner, A. T., & Moffitt, G. (2007). Uncertainty, entitativity, and group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(1), 135–142.10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.008Search in Google Scholar

Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651.10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651Search in Google Scholar

Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337.10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600Search in Google Scholar

Kaddor, L. (2017). Vom Klassenzimmer in den Heiligen Krieg–Warum Jugendliche islamistische Fundamentalisten werden. In Salafismus in Deutschland (pp. 91–102). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.10.1007/978-3-658-15097-6_6Search in Google Scholar

Kay, A. C., & Eibach, R. P. (2013). Compensatory control and its implications for ideological extremism. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), 564–585.10.1111/josi.12029Search in Google Scholar

Knight, K. (2006). Transformations of the concept of ideology in the twentieth century. The American Political Science Review, 100(4), 619–626.10.1017/S0003055406062502Search in Google Scholar

Koomen, W., & Van Der Pligt, J. (2015). The psychology of radicalization and terrorism. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315771984Search in Google Scholar

McGregor, I., Prentice, M., & Nash, K. (2013). Anxious uncertainty and reactive approach motivation (RAM) for religious, idealistic, and lifestyle extremes. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), 537–563.10.1111/josi.12028Search in Google Scholar

Merari, A., Diamant, I., Bibi, A., Broshi, Y., & Zakin, G. (2009). Personality characteristics of “self-martyrs”/“suicide bombers” and organizers of suicide attacks. Terrorism and Political Violence, 22(1), 87–101.10.1080/09546550903409312Search in Google Scholar

Mumford, M. D., Bedell-Avers, K. E., Hunter, S. T., Espejo, J., Eubanks, D., & Connelly, M. S. (2008). Violence in ideological and non-ideological groups: A quantitative analysis of qualitative data. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(6), 1521–1561.10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00358.xSearch in Google Scholar

Piazza, J. A. (2011). Poverty, minority economic discrimination, and domestic terrorism. Journal of Peace Research, 48(3), 339–353.10.1177/0022343310397404Search in Google Scholar

Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S. (1997). Why do we need what we need? A terror management perspective on the roots of human social motivation. Psychological Inquiry, 8(1), 1–20.10.1207/s15327965pli0801_1Search in Google Scholar

Schwartz, B. (2000). Self-determination: The tyranny of freedom. American Psychologist, 55(1), 79.10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.79Search in Google Scholar

Slotter, E. B., Winger, L., & Soto, N. (2015). Lost without each other: The influence of group identity loss on the self-concept. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 19(1), 15.10.1037/gdn0000020Search in Google Scholar

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 33(47), 74.Search in Google Scholar

Thorbecke, E., & Charumilind, C. (2002). Economic inequality and its socioeconomic impact. World Development, 30(9), 1477–1495.10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00052-9Search in Google Scholar

Wagoner, J. A., & Hogg, M. A. (2016). Uncertainty and group identification: Moderation by warmth and competence as cues to inclusion and identity validation. Self and Identity, 15(5), 525–535.10.1080/15298868.2016.1163284Search in Google Scholar

Zhou, L. (1990). On a conjecture by Gale about one-sided matching problems. Journal of Economic Theory, 52(1), 123–135.10.1016/0022-0531(90)90070-ZSearch in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-10-11

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/peps-2017-0030/html
Scroll to top button