Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

 

Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik

Editor-in-Chief: Haucap, Justus

Ed. by Arnold, Lutz / Corneo, Giacomo / Grimm, Veronika / Horn, Karen / Schneider, Friedrich / Wagner, Franz / Winter, Joachim


CiteScore 2017: 0.18

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.242
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.332

Online
ISSN
1468-2516
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 19, Issue 2

Issues

Ein Staatsfonds, der eine soziale Dividende finanziert

Giacomo Corneo
  • Corresponding author
  • Freie Universität Berlin, CEPR, London, CESifo, München, IMK, Düsseldorf, IZA, BonnFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-07-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pwp-2017-0039

Zusammenfassung

Die Regierung eines Landes kann sich zum risikolosen Zins verschulden und in den Weltaktienmarkt investieren. Die Aktienerträge werden abzüglich der Finanzierungskosten an die Bürger des Landes in Form einer sozialen Dividende weitergegeben. Welche Effekte hat diese Politik auf die Wohlfahrt der Bürger? Der vorliegende Beitrag identifiziert in einem einfachen theoretischen Rahmen Bedingungen, unter denen eine solche Politik eine Pareto-Verbesserung hervorruft und argumentiert für deren Einführung in Deutschland.

JEL-Klassifikation: H1

Schlüsselwörter: Staatsfonds; Ungleichheit; Finanzmärkte; Pareto-Verbesserung

Literaturhinweise

  • Acemoglu, D. und P. Restrepo (2017), Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets, MIT, NBER Working Paper 23285.Google Scholar

  • Agarwal, S. und B. Mazumder (2013), Cognitive abilities and household financial decision making, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 5, S. 193–207.Google Scholar

  • AlHassan, A., M. Papaioannou, M. Skancke und C. C. Sung (2013), Sovereign wealth funds: Aspects of governance structures and investment management, IMF Working Paper 13/231.Google Scholar

  • Andersen, S. und K. Nielsen (2011), Participation constraints in the stock market: Evidence from unexpected inheritance due to sudden death, Review of Financial Studies 24, S. 1667–97.Google Scholar

  • Atkinson, A. (2015), Inequality, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bach, L., L. Calvet und L. Sodini (2015), Rich pickings? Risk, return, and skills in the portfolios of the wealthy, Mimeo, Stockholm School of Economics.Google Scholar

  • Bach, S. und A. Thiemann (2016), Hohe Erbschaftswelle, niedriges Erbschaftsteueraufkommen, DIW Wochenbericht Nr. 3.Google Scholar

  • Barberis, N. und M. Huang (2008), The loss aversion/narrow framing approach to the equity premium puzzle, in: R. Mehra (Hrsg.), Handbook of the Equity Risk Premium, Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar

  • Bayer, C. und F. Juessen (2012), The lifecycle and the businesscycle of wage risk – crosscountry comparisons, Economics Letters 117, S. 831–33.Google Scholar

  • Berg, A., E. Buffie und L. F. Zanna (2017), Robots, growth, and inequality: Should we fear the robot revolution? (The correct answer is Yes), IMF Working Paper.Google Scholar

  • Bernstein, S., J. Lerner und A. Shoar (2013), The investment strategies of sovereign wealth funds, Journal of Economic Perspectives 27, S. 219–38.Google Scholar

  • Bönke, T. und H. Brinkmann (2017), Privates Vermögen und Vermögensförderung in Deutschland, Bertelsmann Stiftung, Inklusives Wachstum für Deutschland 10.Google Scholar

  • Bönke, T., G. Corneo und H. Lüthen (2015), Lifetime earnings inequality in Germany, Journal of Labor Economics 33, S. 171–208.Google Scholar

  • Brunner, J. (2014), Die Erbschaftsteuer – Bestandteil eines optimalen Steuersystems?, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 10, S. 199–218.Google Scholar

  • Caballero, R., E. Farhi und P. O. Gourinchas (2016), Safe asset scarcity and aggregate demand, CEPR Discussion Paper 11170.Google Scholar

  • Calvet, L., J. Campbell und P. Sodini (2007), Down or out: Assessing the welfare costs of household investment mistakes, Journal of Political Economy 115, S. 707–47.Google Scholar

  • Chetty, R., J. Friedman, S. Leth-Petersen, T. Nielsen und T. Olsen (2014), Active vs. passive decisions and crowd-out in retirement savings accounts: Evidence from Denmark, Quarterly Journal of Economics 129, S. 1141–1219.Google Scholar

  • Chiu, W. H. und L. Eeckhoudt (2010), The effects of stochastic wages and non-labor income on labor supply: Update and extensions, Journal of Economics 100, S. 69–83.Google Scholar

  • Christiansen, J. und G. Rudebusch (2017), A new normal for interest rates? Evidence from inflationindexed debt, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper 2017–07.Google Scholar

  • Clark, G., A. Dixon und A. Monk (2013), Sovereign Wealth Funds: Legitimacy, Governance and Global Power, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Constantinides, G. und A. Ghosh (2017), Asset pricing with countercyclical household consumption risk, Journal of Finance 72, S. 415–59.Google Scholar

  • Corneo, G. (2014), Public capital in the 21st century, Social Europe Journal, research essay N 2.Google Scholar

  • Corneo, G. (2015), Kapitalsteuern und öffentliches Eigentum, Berliner Debatte Initial 26, S. 119–27.Google Scholar

  • Corneo, G. (2018), Public stock ownership, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 89, S. 11–24.Google Scholar

  • DAI (2016), Aktionärszahlen des Deutschen Aktieninstituts 2015, Frankfurt.Google Scholar

  • Daly, K. (2016), A secular increase in the equity risk premium, International Finance 19, S. 179–200.Google Scholar

  • Das, S., C. Kuhnen und S. Nagel (2017), Socioeconomic status and macroeconomic expectations, CEPR Discussion Paper 124–64.Google Scholar

  • Deutsche Bundesbank (2016), Household wealth and finances in Germany: Results of the 2014 survey, Deutsche Bundesbank Monthly Report, March.Google Scholar

  • Diamond, P. und J. Geanakoplos (2003), Social security investment in equities, American Economic Review 93, S. 1047–74.Google Scholar

  • Fagereng, A., L. Guiso, D. Malacrino und L. Pistaferri (2016), Heterogeneity in returns to wealth, and the measurement of wealth inequality, American Economic Review 106, S. 651–55.Google Scholar

  • Geyer, J. und V. Steiner (2014), Future public pensions and changing employment patterns across birth cohorts, Journal of Pension Economics & Finance 13, S. 172–209.Google Scholar

  • Goldsmith, S. (2012), The economic and social impacts of the Permanent Fund Dividend on Alaska, in: K. Widerquist und M. W. Howard (Hrsg.), Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Grinblatt, M., M. Keloharju und J. Linnainmaa (2011), IQ and stock market participation, Journal of Finance 66, S. 2121–64.Google Scholar

  • Grossmann, V. und H. Strulik (2010), Should continued family firms face lower taxes than other estates? Journal of Public Economics 94, S. 87–101.Google Scholar

  • Guiso, L., P. Sapienza und L. Zingales (2008), Trusting the stock market, Journal of Finance 63, S. 2557–2600.Google Scholar

  • Guvenen, F., S. Schulhofer-Wohl, J. Song und M. Yogo (2017), Worker betas: Five facts about systematic earnings risk, American Economic Review 107, S. 398–403.Google Scholar

  • Haliassos, M. und C. Bertaut (1995), Why do so few hold stocks?, Economic Journal 105, S. 1110–29.Google Scholar

  • Holston, K., T. Laubach und J. Williams (2016), Measuring the natural rate of interest: International trends and determinants, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper 2016–11.Google Scholar

  • Jappelli, T. und M. Padula (2013), Investment in financial knowledge and saving decisions, Journal of Banking and Finance 37, S. 2779–92.Google Scholar

  • Johannsen, B. und E. Mertens (2016), A time series model of interest rates with the effective lower bound, Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2016–033, Washington, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.Google Scholar

  • Kopczuk, W. 2013), Taxation of intergenerational transfers and wealth, in: Handbook of Public Economics 5, Amsterdam, North-Holland.Google Scholar

  • Krebs, T. und Y. Yao (2016), Labor market risk in Germany, Mimeo, University of Mannheim.Google Scholar

  • Kuziemko, I., M. Norton, E. Saez und S. Stantcheva (2015), How elastic are preferences for redistribution? Evidence from randomized survey experiments, American Economic Review 105, S. 1478–1508.Google Scholar

  • Lubik, T. und C. Matthes (2015), Calculating the natural rate of interest: A comparison of two alternative approaches, Economic Brief 15–10, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.Google Scholar

  • Lusardi, A., P. C. Michaud und O. Mitchell (2017), Optimal financial knowledge and wealth inequality, Journal of Political Economy 125, S. 431–77.Google Scholar

  • Malkiel, B. (2013), Asset management fees and the growth of finance, Journal of Economic Perspectives 27, S. 97–108.Google Scholar

  • Mankiw, G. (2000), The savers-spenders theory of fiscal policy, American Economic Review 90, S. 120–25.Google Scholar

  • Mankiw, G. und S. Zeldes (1991), The consumption of stockholders and nonstockholders, Journal of Financial Economics 29, S. 97–112.Google Scholar

  • Meade, J. (1984), Full employment, new technologies and the distribution of income, Journal of Social Policy 13, S. 129–46.Google Scholar

  • Mehra, R. und E. Prescott (2008), The equity risk premium: ABC, in: R. Mehra (Hrsg.), Handbook of the Equity Risk Premium, Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar

  • Piketty, T. und E. Saez (2013), A theory of optimal inheritance taxation, Econometrica 81, S. 185–86.Google Scholar

  • Prettner, K. und H. Strulik (2017), The lost race against the machine: Automation, education, and inequality in an R&D-based growth model, cege Discussion Papers 329.Google Scholar

  • Quirin Bank (2016), Einstellungen und Verhaltensweisen zur Geldanlage in Deutschland und den USA, Anleger-Studie der Quirin Bank, Berlin.Google Scholar

  • Rachel, L. und T. Smith (2015), Secular drivers of the global real interest rate, Bank of England, Staff WP 571.Google Scholar

  • Samuelson, P. (1969), Lifetime portfolio selection by dynamic stochastic programming, Review of Economics and Statistics 51, S. 239–46.Google Scholar

  • Stiglitz, J. (2015), New theoretical perspectives on the distribution of income and wealth among individuals: Part II: Equilibrium wealth distributions, NBER Working Paper 211–90.Google Scholar

  • Vissing-Jorgensen, A. (2004), Perspectives on behavioral finance: Does „irrationality“ disappear with wealth? Evidence from expectations and actions, in: M. Gertler und K. Rogoff (Hrsg.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2003, Cambridge, MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • von Gaudecker, H. M. (2015), How does household portfolio diversification vary with financial literacy and financial advice?, Journal of Finance 70, S. 489–506.Google Scholar

  • von Weizsäcker, C. C. (2015), Kapitalismus in der Krise? Der negative natürliche Zins und seine Folgen für die Politik, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 16, S. 189–212.Google Scholar

  • Wang, J. und P. Gong (2013), Labor supply with stochastic wage rate and non-labor income uncertainty, Journal of Economics 109, S. 41–55.Google Scholar

  • Willis, L. (2011), The financial education fallacy, American Economic Review 101, S. 429–34.Google Scholar

  • Wissenschaftlicher Beirat beim BMF (2012), Die Begünstigung des Unternehmensvermögens in der Erbschaftsteuer, Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Berlin, Gutachten 01/2012.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-07-05

Published in Print: 2018-07-04


Citation Information: Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 94–109, ISSN (Online) 1468-2516, ISSN (Print) 1465-6493, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pwp-2017-0039.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in