Machine Learning and Law and Economics: A Preliminary Overview

Sangchul Park 1  and Haksoo Ko 1
  • 1 Seoul National University, Seoul, the Republic of Korea
Sangchul Park and Haksoo Ko

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of machine learning models, as compared to traditional economic models. It also lays out emerging issues in law and economics that the machine learning methodology raises. In doing so, Asian contexts are considered. Law and economics scholarship has applied econometric models for statistical inferences, but law as social engineering often requires forward-looking predictions rather than retrospective inferences. Machine learning can be used as an alternative or supplementary tool to improve the accuracy of legal prediction by controlling out-of-sample variance along with in-sample bias and by fitting diverse models to data with non-linear or otherwise complex distribution. In the legal arena, the past experience of using economic models in antitrust and other high-stakes litigation provides a clue as to how to introduce artificial intelligence into the legal decision-making process. Law and economics is also expected to provide useful insights as to how to balance the development of the artificial intelligence technology with fundamental social values such as human rights and autonomy.

  • Asaro, P. M. 2019. “AI Ethics in Predictive Policing: From Models of Threat to an Ethics of Care.” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 38(2): 40–53, https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2019.2915154.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Barocas, S., and A. D. Selbst. 2016. “Big Data’s Disparate Impact.” California Law Review 104(3): 671–732.

  • Buchanan, B. G., and T. E. Headrick. 1970. “Some Speculation About Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning.” Stanford Law Review 23: 40–62, https://doi.org/10.2307/1227753.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Calvano, E., G. Calzolari, V. Denicolo, and S. Pastorello. 2018. “Artificial Intelligence, Algorithmic Pricing and Collusion.” SSRN, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3304991.

  • Corbett-Davies, S., E. Pierson, A. Feller, S. Goel, and A. Huq. 2017. “Algorithmic Decision Making and the Cost of Fairness.” In Proceedings of the 23rd Acm Sigkdd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, https://doi.org/10.1145/3097983.309809.

  • Cortes, C., and V. N. Vapnik. 1995. “Support-Vector Networks.” Machine Learning 20(3): 273–97, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Deng, A. 2018. “What Do We Know About Algorithmic Tacit Collusion.” Antitrust 33(1): 88–95.

  • Dressel, J., and H. Farid. 2018. “The Accuracy, Fairness, and Limits of Predicting Recidivism.” Science Advances 4(1): eaao5580, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao5580.

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Ezrachi, A., and M. E. Stucke. 2017. “Algorithmic Collusion: Problems and Counter-measures.” OECD Roundtable on Algorithms and Collusion DAF/COMP/WD(2017) 25: 2–35, https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=DAF/COMP/WD%282017%2925&docLanguage=En.

  • Ezrachi, A., and M. E Stucke. 2016. Virtual Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Fagan, F., and S. Levmore. 2019. “The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Rules, Standards, and Judicial Discretion.” Southern California Law Review 93(1): 1–36.

  • Feldman, M., S. A. Friedler, J. Moeller, C. Scheidegger, and S. Venkatasubramanian. 2015. “Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact.” In KDD ’15: Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 268–59, https://doi.org/10.1145/2783258.2783311.

  • Hart, H. L. A. 1958. “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals.” Harvard Law Review 71(4): 593–629, https://doi.org/10.2307/1338225.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. 2009. The Elements of Statistical Learning, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer New York.

  • Ittoo, A., and N. Petit. 2017. Algorithmic Pricing Agents and Tacit Collusion: A Technological Perspective. L’intelligence artificielle et le droit, 1st ed. 241–56. Larcier, Bruxelles.

  • Klein, T. 2019. “Autonomous Algorithmic Collusion: Q-Learning Under Sequential Pricing.” Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No. 2018-15.

  • Kleinberg, J. M., Ludwig, J., Mullainathan, S., and Obermeyer, Z. 2015. “Prediction Policy Problems.” American Economic Review 105(5): 491–95, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20151023.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Kleinberg, J. M., H. Lakkaraju, J. Leskovec, J. Ludwig, and S. Mullainathan. 2018. “Human Decisions and Machine Predictions.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 133(1): 237–93, https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx032.

  • Le Calonnec, Y. 2017. “Bias-Variance and Error Analysis.” http://cs229.stanford.edu/notes2020spring/bias-variance-error-analysis.pdf (accessed July 14, 2020).

  • McCarty, L. T. 1977. “Reflections on TAXMAN: An Experiment in Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning.” Harvard Law Review 90(5): 837–93, https://doi.org/10.2307/1340132.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Mehra, S. K. 2014. “De-Humanizing Antitrust: The Rise of the Machines and the Regulation of Competition.” Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-43. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2490651.

  • Ng, A. 2018. CS229 Lecture Notes. http://cs229.stanford.edu/notes/ (accessed July 14, 2020).

  • Posner, R. A. 2005. “Intellectual Property: The Law and Economics Approach.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(2): 57–73, https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330054048704.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Pound, R. 1954. “The Lawyer as a Social Engineer.” Journal of Public Law 3: 292.

  • Russell, S. J.and, P. Norvig. 2010. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 3. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Stigler, G. J. 1980. “An Introduction to Privacy in Economics and Politics.” Journal of Legal Studies 9(4): 623–44, https://doi.org/10.1086/467657.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Ulenaers, J. 2020. “The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Right to a Fair Trial: Towards a Robot Judge?.” Asian Journal of Law and Economics 11(2). In this issue.

  • VanNostrand, M. 2013. “New Jersey Jail Population Analysis: Identifying Opportunities to Safely and Responsibly Reduce the Jail Population.” Luminosity. http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=264950.(accessed July 14, 2020).

  • Varian, H. R. 2014. “Big Data: New Tricks for Econometrics.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 28(2): 3–28, https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.2.3.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Verma, S., and J. Rubin. 2018. “Fairness Definitions Explained.” In FairWare 2018: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Workshop on Software Fairness, https://doi.org/10.1145/3194770.3194776.

  • Wolfram, S. 2018. Computational Law, Symbolic Discourse, and the AI Constitution. Data-Driven Law, 103–26. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


or
Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

Search